Evaluation of an Intervention Program Targeted at Improving Balance and Functional Skills After Stroke
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to evaluate a 5-week intervention program targeted at improving balance and functional skills for people with stroke.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Cerebrovascular Accident Musculoskeletal Equilibrium |
Behavioral: high intensity functional exercise |
Phase 2 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Outcomes Assessor) |
| Official Title: | Evaluation of an Intervention Program Targeted at Improving Balance and Functional Skills After Stroke - a Randomized Controlled Study |
- Improvement in balance [ Time Frame: post, 3 & 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Reduced falls [ Time Frame: post, 3 & 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Improved self-efficacy [ Time Frame: post, 3 & 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Improved ADL [ Time Frame: post, 3 & 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Improved walking ability [ Time Frame: post, 3 & 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
| Enrollment: | 34 |
| Study Start Date: | September 2006 |
| Study Completion Date: | April 2008 |
| Primary Completion Date: | April 2008 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
-
Behavioral: high intensity functional exercise
Many people with stroke experience a deterioration in balance and a functional decline due to hemiplegic muscle strength. This tend to restrict the persons activity in daily life and also leads to a low falls self efficacy.
High intensity exercise have shown to be effective for improving strength and balance for older people in general living in residential care facilities. It is interesting to see if this high intensity exercise also is applicable in the older stroke population.
Comparison: An intervention group receives three training sessions per week and one theory session per week during 5 weeks, compared to a control group that receives one theory session per week during 5 weeks.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 55 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- 55 years of age or older
- stroke diagnosis 3-6 months prior to inclusion
- ability to walk 10 meter with or without assistive device
- ability to understand simple instructions
Exclusion Criteria:
- TIA
- independent in walking outdoors
- serious visual impairment
- serious hearing impairment
- long distance to intervention station
Contacts and Locations| Sweden | |
| Umeå University, department of Community science and rehabilitation | |
| Umeå, Sweden, 90137 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Eva Holmgren, PhD student | Umeå University & The Vårdal Institute |
| Study Chair: | Per Wester, MD Professor | Umeå University |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Umea University, Mrs Eva Holmgren, RPt, PhD student, Umea University |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00377689 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | Dnr 04-022 |
| Study First Received: | September 15, 2006 |
| Last Updated: | October 27, 2008 |
| Health Authority: | Sweden: Regional Ethical Review Board |
Keywords provided by Umeå University:
|
Accidental falls Cerebrovascular accident Balance ADL |
Self efficacy Quality of Life Gait parameters |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Cerebral Infarction Stroke Brain Infarction Brain Ischemia Cerebrovascular Disorders |
Brain Diseases Central Nervous System Diseases Nervous System Diseases Vascular Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2013