Better Pediatric Asthma Outcomes Through Chronic Care
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
This 3-year, multi-site study focuses on the translation of cost-effective methods to bring a chronic care model to the care of poor, minority, inner-city children with asthma, at risk of the worst outcomes for the leading chronic disease of children.
The specific aims are to:
- Develop a computer support system to deliver peer-driven, patient-linked Guideline prompts at the point of care using affordable information technology;
- Evaluate the effect of the Guideline prompt system on the process and outcomes (symptom control, health-related-quality-of-life, ED and hospitalizations) of asthma care; and
- Evaluate the added effect on outcomes of family-focused, supportive education delivered by a community health worker.
The key product of the computer support system is a guideline prompt that serves as the mechanism for integrating patient specific data with standards of care. 548 children, ages 5-18, with physician diagnosed asthma, enrolled in one Medicaid Managed Care Organization in CT, and receiving care at one of four Federally Qualified Community Health Centers will be recruited. All sites will have access to the computer support system and the to-be-developed, Guideline-Driven Clinical Standards of Asthma Care. In Phase I (12 months), the effect of prompts delivered at the point of care on patient outcomes will be compared to the effect of no-prompt care. In Phase II (6 months), the effect of family-focused, supportive education will be assessed in combination with prompted care compared to no-prompt care and compared to no education. All patients will receive standard screening and outreach to keep appointments. Data will be obtained from medical records, medical and pharmacy claims data as well as patient and parent interviews at baseline and quarterly for 18 months.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Asthma |
Behavioral: electronic (computer based) provider feedback tool |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Non-Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Factorial Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Subject) Primary Purpose: Health Services Research |
| Official Title: | Better Pediatric Asthma Outcomes Through Chronic Care |
- asthma control [ Time Frame: assessed at all 5 study visits ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- guideline appropriate medicating by providers [ Time Frame: assessed at all 5 study visits ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- patient knowledge [ Time Frame: assessed at all 5 study visits ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- self efficacy [ Time Frame: assessed at all 5 study visits ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- social support [ Time Frame: assessed at all 5 study visits ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Enrollment: | 548 |
| Study Start Date: | August 2001 |
| Study Completion Date: | May 2003 |
| Primary Completion Date: | May 2003 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: 1
Received the Basic Pediatric Chronic Care Model AND the Medication Assessment Prompt AND family education
|
Behavioral: electronic (computer based) provider feedback tool
All sites received a Basic Pediatric Chronic Care Model; 2x2 factorial design allocated the additional Medication Assessment Prompt and family education across the four sites as well.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: 2
Received the Basic Pediatric Chronic Care Model AND the Medication Assessment Prompt but NOT family education
|
Behavioral: electronic (computer based) provider feedback tool
All sites received a Basic Pediatric Chronic Care Model; 2x2 factorial design allocated the additional Medication Assessment Prompt and family education across the four sites as well.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: 3
Received the Basic Pediatric Chronic Care Model AND family education but NOT the Medication Assessment Prompt
|
Behavioral: electronic (computer based) provider feedback tool
All sites received a Basic Pediatric Chronic Care Model; 2x2 factorial design allocated the additional Medication Assessment Prompt and family education across the four sites as well.
Other Names:
|
|
Placebo Comparator: 4
Received the Basic Pediatric Chronic Care Model only (NO Medication Assessment Prompt and NO family education)
|
Behavioral: electronic (computer based) provider feedback tool
All sites received a Basic Pediatric Chronic Care Model; 2x2 factorial design allocated the additional Medication Assessment Prompt and family education across the four sites as well.
Other Names:
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 5 Years to 17 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- determined by provider to be asthmatic
- member of Medical Managed Care Organization partner group
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Contacts and Locations| United States, Connecticut | |
| University of Connecticut Health Center | |
| Farmington, Connecticut, United States, 06030 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Judith Fifield, PhD | University of Connecticut Health Center |
More Information
Publications:
Additional publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
| Responsible Party: | Judith Fifield, PhD, Professor, University of Connecticut Health Center |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00355069 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 1U18HS11068-01, AHRQ Grant #U18-HS-011068 |
| Study First Received: | July 19, 2006 |
| Last Updated: | July 10, 2008 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Keywords provided by University of Connecticut Health Center:
|
pediatric asthma translational research health information technology |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Asthma Bronchial Diseases Respiratory Tract Diseases Lung Diseases, Obstructive Lung Diseases |
Respiratory Hypersensitivity Hypersensitivity, Immediate Hypersensitivity Immune System Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 19, 2013