Safety and Efficacy of MultiHance in Pediatric Patients
This study has been terminated.
(Adequate statistical power at 92 dosed pts to meet study objectives.)
Sponsor:
Bracco Diagnostics, Inc
Information provided by:
Bracco Diagnostics, Inc
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00323310
First received: May 5, 2006
Last updated: October 13, 2010
Last verified: October 2010
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and enhancing properties of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agent MultiHance in children aged 2 to 17 years having central nervous system (CNS) disorders.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Central Nervous System Diseases |
Drug: gadobenate dimeglumine |
Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Non-Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Diagnostic |
| Official Title: | A Phase III Multi-Center Open Label Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of MultiHance at the Dose of 0.10 mmol/kg in Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Central Nervous System in Pediatric Patients |
Resource links provided by NLM:
Further study details as provided by Bracco Diagnostics, Inc:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- Delineation of Lesion Border (Change From Pre to Pre+Postdose) for Reader 1 [ Time Frame: pre-dose and immediately postdose ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]5-point scale (0=no delineation of lesion borders [lesion not identified in image, lesion borders not visible]; 1=poor border delineation [all borders poorly distinct, lesion not separated from surrounding tissues/structures/edema]; 2=moderate border delineation [border delineation fair/not complete, lesion not clearly separated]; 3=good border delineation [border delineation complete, lesion adequately separated]; 4=excellent border delineation [borders sharply/clearly distinct, lesion sharply separated]) paired assessment to compare the difference between pre to pre+postdose
- Delineation of Lesion Border (Change From Pre to Pre+Postdose) for Reader 2 [ Time Frame: pre-dose and immediately postdose ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]5-point scale (0=no delineation of lesion borders [lesion not identified in image, lesion borders not visible]; 1=poor border delineation [all borders poorly distinct, lesion not separated from surrounding tissues/structures/edema]; 2=moderate border delineation [border delineation fair/not complete, lesion not clearly separated]; 3=good border delineation [border delineation complete, lesion adequately separated]; 4=excellent border delineation [borders sharply/clearly distinct, lesion sharply separated]) paired assessment to compare the difference between pre to pre+postdose
- Delineation of Lesion Border (Change From Pre to Pre+Postdose) for Reader 3 [ Time Frame: pre-dose and immediately postdose ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]5-point scale (0=no delineation of lesion borders [lesion not identified in image, lesion borders not visible]; 1=poor border delineation [all borders poorly distinct, lesion not separated from surrounding tissues/structures/edema]; 2=moderate border delineation [border delineation fair/not complete, lesion not clearly separated]; 3=good border delineation [border delineation complete, lesion adequately separated]; 4=excellent border delineation [borders sharply/clearly distinct, lesion sharply separated]) paired assessment to compare the difference between pre to pre+postdose
- Visualization of Lesion Internal Morphology (Change From Pre to Pre+Postdose) for Reader 1 [ Time Frame: pre-dose to immediately post dose ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]5-point scale (0=no visualization of lesion internal morphology (LIM) [lesion not identified in image, not visible]; 1=poor visualization of LIM [insufficiently depicted, intralesional features poorly identified]; 2=moderate visualization of LIM [not completely depicted, some intralesional features visible]; 3=good visualization of LIM [completely depicted, intralesional features adequately identified]; 4=excellent visualization of LIM [optimally depicted, intralesional features clearly identified and characterized]) paired assessment to compare the difference between pre to pre+postdose
- Visualization of Lesion Internal Morphology (Change From Pre to Pre+Postdose) for Reader 2 [ Time Frame: pre-dose to immediately post dose ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]5-point scale (0=no visualization of lesion internal morphology (LIM) [lesion not identified in image, not visible]; 1=poor visualization of LIM [insufficiently depicted, intralesional features poorly identified]; 2=moderate visualization of LIM [not completely depicted, some intralesional features visible]; 3=good visualization of LIM [completely depicted, intralesional features adequately identified]; 4=excellent visualization of LIM [optimally depicted, intralesional features clearly identified and characterized]) paired assessment to compare the difference between pre to pre+postdose
- Visualization of Lesion Internal Morphology (Change From Pre to Pre+Postdose) for Reader 3 [ Time Frame: pre-dose to immediately postdose ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]5-point scale (0=no visualization of lesion internal morphology (LIM) [lesion not identified in image, not visible]; 1=poor visualization of LIM [insufficiently depicted, intralesional features poorly identified]; 2=moderate visualization of LIM [not completely depicted, some intralesional features visible]; 3=good visualization of LIM [completely depicted, intralesional features adequately identified]; 4=excellent visualization of LIM [optimally depicted, intralesional features clearly identified and characterized]) paired assessment to compare the difference between pre to pre+postdose
- Lesion Contrast Enhancement (CE) (Change From Pre to Pre+Postdose) for Reader 1 [ Time Frame: pre-dose and immediately postdose ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]5-point scale (0=no lesion CE [lesion not identified in image, no contrast between lesion and surrounding normal brain/spine tissue]; 1=poor lesion CE [diff. in signal intensity (SI) poor, lesion barely identified, not possible to evaluate/measure size]; 2=moderate lesion CE [diff. in SI fair, lesion identified, not possible to evaluate/measure size]; 3=good lesion CE [diff. in SI adequate, lesion identified, size evaluated/measured]; 4=excellent lesion CE [diff. in SI marked, lesion identified, size measured]) paired assessment to compare the diff. between pre to pre+postdose
- Lesion Contrast Enhancement (CE) (Change From Pre to Pre+Postdose) for Reader 2 [ Time Frame: pre-dose to immediately postdose ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]5-point scale (0=no lesion CE [lesion not identified in image, no contrast between lesion and surrounding normal brain/spine tissue]; 1=poor lesion CE [diff. in signal intensity (SI) poor, lesion barely identified, not possible to evaluate/measure size]; 2=moderate lesion CE [diff. in SI fair, lesion identified, not possible to evaluate/measure size]; 3=good lesion CE [diff. in SI adequate, lesion identified, size evaluated/measured]; 4=excellent lesion CE [diff. in SI marked, lesion identified, size measured]) paired assessment to compare the diff. between pre to pre+postdose
- Lesion Contrast Enhancement (CE) (Change From Pre to Pre+Postdose) for Reader 3 [ Time Frame: pre-dose to immediately postdose ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]5-point scale (0=no lesion CE [lesion not identified in image, no contrast between lesion and surrounding normal brain/spine tissue]; 1=poor lesion CE [diff. in signal intensity (SI) poor, lesion barely identified, not possible to evaluate/measure size]; 2=moderate lesion CE [diff. in SI fair, lesion identified, not possible to evaluate/measure size]; 3=good lesion CE [diff. in SI adequate, lesion identified, size evaluated/measured]; 4=excellent lesion CE [diff. in SI marked, lesion identified, size measured]) paired assessment to compare the diff. between pre to pre+postdose
- The Number of Patients Administered MultiHance (Gadobenate Dimeglumine) Reporting Adverse Events [ Time Frame: up to 72 hours post dose ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
| Enrollment: | 92 |
| Study Start Date: | April 2006 |
| Study Completion Date: | September 2008 |
| Primary Completion Date: | September 2008 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
| Experimental: Gadobenate Dimeglumine |
Drug: gadobenate dimeglumine
A dose of 0.10 mmol/kg (i.e., 0.2 mL/kg) of 0.5 molar MultiHance was injected intravenously at a rate of 2 mL/sec as a single dose.
Other Name: MultiHance
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 2 Years to 17 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Between 2 and 17 years of age
- Informed consent from parents
- Assent from patient where required
- Known or highly suspected disease of the CNS and referred for either cranial or spinal MRI examination
Exclusion Criteria:
- Contraindication to MRI
- Undergoing MRI in an emergency situation
- Known allergy to one or more of the ingredients in MultiHance
- Sickle cell anemia moderate to severe renal impairment
- Received another investigational compound within 30 days
- Pregnancy
- Lactating females
- Likely to undergo an invasive procedure within 72 hours of receiving MultiHance
Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00323310
Locations
| United States, New Jersey | |
| Bracco Diagnostics, Inc. | |
| Princeton, New Jersey, United States, 08540 | |
Sponsors and Collaborators
Bracco Diagnostics, Inc
Investigators
| Study Director: | Gianpaolo Pirovano, M.D. | Bracco Diagnostics, Inc |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Gianpaolo Pirovano, Executive Director, Corporate Medical Development, Bracco Diagnostics, Inc |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00323310 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | MH 110 |
| Study First Received: | May 5, 2006 |
| Results First Received: | August 16, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | October 13, 2010 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Keywords provided by Bracco Diagnostics, Inc:
|
disease of the central nervous system (brain or spine) |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Central Nervous System Diseases Nervous System Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 19, 2013