Study of (Mirapex) Pramipexole for the Early Treatment of Parkinsons Disease
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals
Information provided by:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00321854
First received: May 3, 2006
Last updated: May 18, 2012
Last verified: May 2012
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
This is a double blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of 15 months duration designed to examine early Mirapex (pramipexole) treatment vs. delayed Mirapex (pramipexole) treatment in patients with new onset Parkinsons disease
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Parkinson Disease |
Drug: pramipexole |
Phase 4 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Clinical Trial to Examine the Efficacy and Safety of Early Pramipexole Treatment Versus Delayed Pramipexole Treatment in Patients With New Onset Parkinson's Disease. |
Resource links provided by NLM:
Further study details as provided by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- Change From Baseline in the Blinded Rater Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Total Score at Month 15 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 15 ]The UPDRS total score (Parts I+II+III) measures the impact of PD on mentation, behaviour and mood, activities of daily living and motor skills on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no disability) to 176 (worst disability)
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- Change From Baseline in the Investigator Rated UPDRS Total Score at Month 15 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 15 ]The UPDRS total score (Parts I+II+III) measures the impact of PD on mentation, behaviour and mood, activities of daily living and motor skills on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no disability) to 176 (worst disability)
- Change From Baseline in the Investigator Rated UPDRS Total Score at Month 9 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 9 ]The UPDRS total score (Parts I+II+III) measures the impact of PD on mentation, behaviour and mood, activities of daily living and motor skills on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no disability) to 176 (worst disability)
- Change From Baseline in the Investigator Rated UPDRS Total Score at Month 6 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6 ]The UPDRS total score (Parts I+II+III) measures the impact of PD on mentation, behaviour and mood, activities of daily living and motor skills on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no disability) to 176 (worst disability)
- Change From Baseline in the Investigator Rated UPDRS Total Score at Month 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 3 ]The UPDRS total score (Parts I+II+III) measures the impact of PD on mentation, behaviour and mood, activities of daily living and motor skills on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no disability) to 176 (worst disability)
- Change From Baseline in the Blinded Rater UPDRS Parts II+III Total Score at Month 15 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 15 ]The UPDRS Parts II+III total score measures the impact of PD on activities of daily living and motor skills on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no disability) to 160 (worst disability)
- Change From Baseline in the Investigator Rated UPDRS Parts II+III Score at Month 15 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 15 ]The UPDRS Parts II+III total score measures the impact of PD on activities of daily living and motor skills on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no disability) to 160 (worst disability)
- Change From Baseline in the Investigator Rated UPDRS Parts II+III Score at Month 9 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 9 ]The UPDRS Parts II+III total score measures the impact of PD on activities of daily living and motor skills on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no disability) to 160 (worst disability)
- Change From Baseline in the Investigator Rated UPDRS Parts II+III Score at Month 6 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6 ]The UPDRS Parts II+III total score measures the impact of PD on activities of daily living and motor skills on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no disability) to 160 (worst disability)
- Change From Baseline in the Investigator Rated UPDRS Parts II+III Score at Month 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 3 ]The UPDRS Parts II+III total score measures the impact of PD on activities of daily living and motor skills on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no disability) to 160 (worst disability)
- Change From Baseline in the Blinded Rater UPDRS Part III Total Score at Month 15 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 15 ]The UPDRS Part III total score measures the impact of PD on motor skills on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no disability) to 108 (worst disability)
- Change From Baseline in the Investigator Rated UPDRS Part III Score at Month 15 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 15 ]The UPDRS Part III total score measures the impact of PD on motor skills on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no disability) to 108 (worst disability)
- Change From Baseline in the Investigator Rated UPDRS Part III Score at Month 9 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 9 ]The UPDRS Part III total score measures the impact of PD on motor skills on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no disability) to 108 (worst disability)
- Change From Baseline in the Investigator Rated UPDRS Part III Score at Month 6 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6 ]The UPDRS Part III total score measures the impact of PD on motor skills on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no disability) to 108 (worst disability)
- Change From Baseline in the Investigator Rated UPDRS Part III Score at Month 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 3 ]The UPDRS Part III total score measures the impact of PD on motor skills on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no disability) to 108 (worst disability)
- Change From Baseline in the Blinded Rater UPDRS Part II Total Score at Month 15 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 15 ]The UPDRS Part II total score measures the impact of PD on activities of daily living on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no disability) to 52 (worst disability)
- Change From Baseline in the Investigator Rated UPDRS Part II Score at Month 15 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 15 ]The UPDRS Part II total score measures the impact of PD on activities of daily living on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no disability) to 52 (worst disability)
- Change From Baseline in the Investigator Rated UPDRS Part II Score at Month 9 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 9 ]The UPDRS Part II total score measures the impact of PD on activities of daily living on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no disability) to 52 (worst disability)
- Change From Baseline in the Investigator Rated UPDRS Part II Score at Month 6 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6 ]The UPDRS Part II total score measures the impact of PD on activities of daily living on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no disability) to 52 (worst disability)
- Change From Baseline in the Investigator Rated UPDRS Part II Score at Month 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 3 ]The UPDRS Part II total score measures the impact of PD on activities of daily living on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no disability) to 52 (worst disability)
- Change From Baseline in the Blinded Rater UPDRS Part I Total Score at Month 15 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 15 ]The UPDRS Part I total score measures the impact of PD on mentation, behaviour and mood on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no disability) to 16 (worst disability)
- Change From Baseline in the Investigator Rated UPDRS Part I Total Score at Month 15 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 15 ]The UPDRS Part I total score measures the impact of PD on mentation, behaviour and mood on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no disability) to 16 (worst disability)
- Change From Baseline in the Investigator Rated UPDRS Part I Total Score at Month 9 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 9 ]The UPDRS Part I total score measures the impact of PD on mentation, behaviour and mood on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no disability) to 16 (worst disability)
- Change From Baseline in the Investigator Rated UPDRS Part I Total Score at Month 6 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6 ]The UPDRS Part I total score measures the impact of PD on mentation, behaviour and mood on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no disability) to 16 (worst disability)
- Change From Baseline in the Investigator Rated UPDRS Part I Total Score at Month 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 3 ]The UPDRS Part I total score measures the impact of PD on mentation, behaviour and mood on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no disability) to 16 (worst disability)
- Number of Responders Using the Blinded Rater Assessment of Clinical Global Impressions of Global Improvement (CGI-I) Score at Month 15 [ Time Frame: Month 15 ]The CGI-I measures the overall improvement in the participants condition from baseline on an ordinal scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Responders are defined as those patients with a CGI-I of 1 or 2.
- Change From Baseline in Blinded Rater Assessment of Clinical Global Impressions of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Category at Month 15 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 15 ]The CGI-S measures the participants severity of illness on an ordinal scale ranging from 1 (normal) to 7 (extremely ill). At Month 15 participants were categorised to 'Improved' (>1 category improvement), 'Unchanged' or 'Worsened' (>1 category worsening).
- Change From Baseline in the Beck Depression Inventory-Version 1A (BDI-IA) Total Score at Month 15 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 15 ]The BDI measures symptoms of depression on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 63 (worst symptoms)
- Change From Baseline in the Beck Depression Inventory-Version 1A (BDI-IA) Total Score at Month 9 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 9 ]The BDI measures symptoms of depression on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 63 (worst symptoms)
- Change From Baseline in the Beck Depression Inventory-Version 1A (BDI-IA) Total Score at Month 6 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6 ]The BDI measures symptoms of depression on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 63 (worst symptoms)
- Change From Baseline in the Beck Depression Inventory-Version 1A (BDI-IA) Total Score at Month 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 3 ]The BDI measures symptoms of depression on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 63 (worst symptoms)
- Change From Baseline in the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39) Overall Index Score at Month 15 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 15 ]The PDQ-39 measures aspects of health in PD participants, the overall index score is the mean of the eight individual domain scores measured on a continuous scale ranging from 0 (no problem at all) to 100 (maximum level of the problem)
- Change From Baseline in the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39) Overall Index Score at Month 9 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 9 ]The PDQ-39 measures aspects of health in PD participants, the overall index score is the mean of the eight individual domain scores measured on a continuous scale ranging from 0 (no problem at all) to 100 (maximum level of the problem)
- Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Scale (EUROQOL (EQ)-5D) Overall Index Score at Month 15 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 15 ]The EQ-5D measures health status on a continuous scale ranging from 0 (dead) to 1 (full health)
- Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Scale (EUROQOL (EQ)-5D) Overall Index Score at Month 9 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 9 ]The EQ-5D measures health status on a continuous scale ranging from 0 (dead) to 1 (full health)
- Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Visual Analogue Scale (EUROQOL (EQ) VAS) Score at Month 15 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 15 ]The EQ-VAS is a self rating of current health-related quality of life measured on a continuous scale ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state)
- Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Visual Analogue Scale (EUROQOL (EQ) VAS) Score at Month 9 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 9 ]The EQ-VAS is a self rating of current health-related quality of life measured on a continuous scale ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state)
- Modified Minnesota Disorders Interview (MMIDI) Risk of Gambling at Month 1 [ Time Frame: Month 1 ]The MMIDI is a semi-structured interview designed to assess impulse control disorders; risk of gambling is assessed via 12 questions, a participant is considered at risk if answering 'Yes' to Q1 and 'Yes' to 5 or more of Q2 to Q12.
- Modified Minnesota Disorders Interview (MMIDI) Risk of Gambling at Month 6 [ Time Frame: Month 6 ]The MMIDI is a semi-structured interview designed to assess impulse control disorders; risk of gambling is assessed via 12 questions, a participant is considered at risk if answering 'Yes' to Q1 and 'Yes' to 5 or more of Q2 to Q12.
- Modified Minnesota Disorders Interview (MMIDI) Risk of Gambling at Month 9 [ Time Frame: Month 9 ]The MMIDI is a semi-structured interview designed to assess impulse control disorders; risk of gambling is assessed via 12 questions, a participant is considered at risk if answering 'Yes' to Q1 and 'Yes' to 5 or more of Q2 to Q12.
- Modified Minnesota Disorders Interview (MMIDI) Risk of Gambling at Month 12 [ Time Frame: Month 12 ]The MMIDI is a semi-structured interview designed to assess impulse control disorders; risk of gambling is assessed via 12 questions, a participant is considered at risk if answering 'Yes' to Q1 and 'Yes' to 5 or more of Q2 to Q12.
- Modified Minnesota Disorders Interview (MMIDI) Risk of Gambling at Month 15 [ Time Frame: Month 15 ]The MMIDI is a semi-structured interview designed to assess impulse control disorders; risk of gambling is assessed via 12 questions, a participant is considered at risk if answering 'Yes' to Q1 and 'Yes' to 5 or more of Q2 to Q12.
- Modified Minnesota Disorders Interview (MMIDI) for Compulsive Sexual Behaviour at Month 1 [ Time Frame: Month 1 ]The MMIDI is a semi-structured interview designed to assess impulse control disorders; compulsive sexual behaviour is assessed via 4 questions, a participant is considered as being compulsive if answering 'Yes' to Q1 and 'Yes' to 1 or more of Q2 to Q4.
- Modified Minnesota Disorders Interview (MMIDI) for Compulsive Sexual Behaviour at Month 6 [ Time Frame: Month 6 ]The MMIDI is a semi-structured interview designed to assess impulse control disorders; compulsive sexual behaviour is assessed via 4 questions, a participant is considered as being compulsive if answering 'Yes' to Q1 and 'Yes' to 1 or more of Q2 to Q4.
- Modified Minnesota Disorders Interview (MMIDI) for Compulsive Sexual Behaviour at Month 9 [ Time Frame: Month 9 ]The MMIDI is a semi-structured interview designed to assess impulse control disorders; compulsive sexual behaviour is assessed via 4 questions, a participant is considered as being compulsive if answering 'Yes' to Q1 and 'Yes' to 1 or more of Q2 to Q4.
- Modified Minnesota Disorders Interview (MMIDI) for Compulsive Sexual Behaviour at Month 12 [ Time Frame: Month 12 ]The MMIDI is a semi-structured interview designed to assess impulse control disorders; compulsive sexual behaviour is assessed via 4 questions, a participant is considered as being compulsive if answering 'Yes' to Q1 and 'Yes' to 1 or more of Q2 to Q4.
- Modified Minnesota Disorders Interview (MMIDI) for Compulsive Sexual Behaviour at Month 15 [ Time Frame: Month 15 ]The MMIDI is a semi-structured interview designed to assess impulse control disorders; compulsive sexual behaviour is assessed via 4 questions, a participant is considered as being compulsive if answering 'Yes' to Q1 and 'Yes' to 1 or more of Q2 to Q4.
- Modified Minnesota Disorders Interview (MMIDI) for Compulsive Buying at Month 1 [ Time Frame: Month 1 ]The MMIDI is a semi-structured interview designed to assess impulse control disorders; compulsive buying is assessed via 4 questions, a participant is considered as being compulsive if answering 'Yes' to Q1a and 'Yes' to 1 or more of Q2a, Q3a and Q4a.
- Modified Minnesota Disorders Interview (MMIDI) for Compulsive Buying at Month 6 [ Time Frame: Month 6 ]The MMIDI is a semi-structured interview designed to assess impulse control disorders; compulsive buying is assessed via 4 questions, a participant is considered as being compulsive if answering 'Yes' to Q1a and 'Yes' to 1 or more of Q2a, Q3a and Q4a.
- Modified Minnesota Disorders Interview (MMIDI) for Compulsive Buying at Month 9 [ Time Frame: Month 9 ]The MMIDI is a semi-structured interview designed to assess impulse control disorders; compulsive buying is assessed via 4 questions, a participant is considered as being compulsive if answering 'Yes' to Q1a and 'Yes' to 1 or more of Q2a, Q3a and Q4a.
- Modified Minnesota Disorders Interview (MMIDI) for Compulsive Buying at Month 12 [ Time Frame: Month 12 ]The MMIDI is a semi-structured interview designed to assess impulse control disorders; compulsive buying is assessed via 4 questions, a participant is considered as being compulsive if answering 'Yes' to Q1a and 'Yes' to 1 or more of Q2a, Q3a and Q4a.
- Modified Minnesota Disorders Interview (MMIDI) for Compulsive Buying at Month 15 [ Time Frame: Month 15 ]The MMIDI is a semi-structured interview designed to assess impulse control disorders; compulsive buying is assessed via 4 questions, a participant is considered as being compulsive if answering 'Yes' to Q1a and 'Yes' to 1 or more of Q2a, Q3a and Q4a.
- Percentage Change From Baseline in the Striatum Uptake at Month 15 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 15 ]The striatum beta-CIT uptake was calculated as mean of the left and right caudate and putamen regions; measured by the Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT).
| Enrollment: | 535 |
| Study Start Date: | May 2006 |
| Primary Completion Date: | April 2009 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 30 Years to 79 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Ability to provide written informed consent in accordance with Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and local legislation;
- Male or female patient with idiopathic Parkinson Disease (PD) confirmed by at least three of the following signs: resting tremor, bradykinesia, rigidity, and asymmetry (must have bradykinesia);
- Parkinsons disease newly diagnosed within the past 2 years;
- Patients with idiopathic PD characterized as Stage I-II by the Modified Hoehn and Yahr Scale who do not require PD medication and will not likely need PD medication for at least 6 months in the opinion of the investigator; Age 30 to 75 years at screening (Visit 1);
- Women of childbearing potential must have a negative serum Beta-HCG pregnancy test at the Screening (Baseline) visit unless surgically sterile or post-menopausal (last menstruation 12 months prior to signing Informed Consent). Women of childbearing potential must be using a medically accepted contraceptive method. Acceptable methods of birth control are limited to: Intra-Uterine Device (IUD), oral, implantable, or injectable contraceptives, estrogen patch, and double barrier method (spermicide + diaphragm); and Patients who are willing and able to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plan, laboratory tests, and other study procedures.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous history of allergic response or complications with pramipexole (PPX) or its excipients;
- Atypical PD syndromes due to either drugs (e.g., metoclopramide, flunarizine) or metabolic disorders (e.g., Wilsons Disease), encephalitis, or degenerative diseases (e.g., progressive supranuclear palsy);
- The patient is currently on L-dopa, dopamine agonists or other PD medication at baseline;
- The patient has been on L-dopa, dopamine agonists or other PD medications for greater than 14 consecutive days prior to baseline;
- If on L-dopa, dopamine agonists or other PD medications prior to baseline, the patient stopped treatment less than 30 days prior to baseline;
- The patient has clinically significant abnormal laboratory values, and/or medical or psychiatric illness other than as seen in Parkinsons disease;
- The patient has a clinically significant deviation from normal in the physical examination other than as seen in Parkinsons disease;
- The patient has any disorder that may interfere with drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion (including gastrointestinal surgery);
- History of stereotactic brain surgery;
- Surgery within 6 months of randomization, which in the opinion of the investigator, would negatively impact the patients participation in the study;
- History of active epilepsy (i.e., occurrence of a seizure) within the past year;
- Symptomatic orthostatic hypotension prior to randomization;
- Malignant melanoma or history of previously treated malignant melanoma;
- Patients who have received any of the following drugs (all time periods are calculated from randomization): Amantadine;
- Electroconvulsive therapy during 180 days preceding the screening visit (Visit 1);
- Patients who are currently pregnant or planning pregnancy during the study, or lactating;
- Participation in other investigational drug studies or use of other investigational drugs within the previous 30 days prior to randomization;
- History of psychosis;
- A diagnosis of dementia
Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00321854
Show 99 Study Locations
Show 99 Study LocationsSponsors and Collaborators
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals
Investigators
| Study Chair: | Boehringer Ingelheim | Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals |
More Information
Additional Information:
Related Info 
Related Info 
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Boehringer Ingelheim, Study Chair, Boehringer Ingelheim |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00321854 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 248.595 |
| Study First Received: | May 3, 2006 |
| Results First Received: | December 18, 2009 |
| Last Updated: | May 18, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | Austria: Bundesamt für Sicherheit im Gesundheitswesen, A-1030 Vienna, Austria Finland: Finnish Medicines Agency France: AFFSAPS Germany: Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices Great Britain: MHRA Italy: Comitato Etico dell'Az. USL 12 di Viareggio - VIAREGGIO Japan: Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare Spain: Spanish Agency for Medicines and Health Products Sweden: Regional Ethics Committee of Stockholm, PO Box 289, SE-17177 Stockholm, Sweden. Medical Products Agency, PO Box 26, SE-751 03 Uppsala, Sweden United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Parkinson Disease Parkinsonian Disorders Basal Ganglia Diseases Brain Diseases Central Nervous System Diseases Nervous System Diseases Movement Disorders Neurodegenerative Diseases Pramipexol Antioxidants Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action |
Pharmacologic Actions Protective Agents Physiological Effects of Drugs Antiparkinson Agents Anti-Dyskinesia Agents Central Nervous System Agents Therapeutic Uses Dopamine Agonists Dopamine Agents Neurotransmitter Agents |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 17, 2013