Efficacy and Safety of Colloids Versus Crystalloids for Fluid Resuscitation in Critically Ill Patients
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Background: Two recent systematic reviews of the literature and meta-analyses have suggested that colloids administration might be deleterious in critically ill patients.
Objective: To compare the effects on hospital mortality of crystalloids and colloids when given for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients.
Setting: Adult intensive care units (ICUs) in several European countries.
Study design: A multinational, randomised, controlled trial performed on two parallel groups.
Intervention: Any type of crystalloids (control group) versus any type of colloids (including albumin).
Patients: All patients above the legal age of consent and hospitalised in an intensive care unit, who need fluid resuscitation (according to the physician). Pregnant women, moribund patients, brain dead patients, and patients who have a known allergy to colloids or severe head injury or major burns (> 20% of body surface) or dehydration will not be included.
Primary endpoint: 28-day mortality.
Hypothesis: Assuming a hospital mortality rate of 20% in the crystalloids group, a 0.05 type I error, 3010 patients are needed to show a difference between the 2 groups of 5% with a 90% probability (two-sided test).
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Critical Illness |
Drug: Crystalloids Drug: Colloids |
Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | CRISTAL: Colloids Compared to Crystalloids in Fluid Resuscitation of Critically Ill Patients: A Multinational Randomised Controlled Trial |
- 28-day mortality [ Time Frame: Day 28 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- ICU and hospital mortality rates [ Time Frame: Day 90 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Number of days free of mechanical ventilation (MV), vasopressors, renal replacement therapy, and organ system failure [ Time Frame: Day 90 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Difference in the area under the curve (AUC) of mean arterial pressure (MAP) from HO to H24, in weight gain, in PaO2/FiO2 ratio, chest X-ray score [ Time Frame: Day 2 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Frequency of adverse events [ Time Frame: day 90 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Length of stay (LOS) [ Time Frame: Day 90 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
| Estimated Enrollment: | 3010 |
| Study Start Date: | December 2002 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | August 2012 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | August 2012 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: 1
Crystalloids, any type of Crystalloids including isotonic or hypertonic saline, Ringer Lactates either modified or not
|
Drug: Crystalloids
Isotonic or hypertonic saline or Ringer Lactate or any other crystalloids, at the necessary dose to restore hemodynamic for all ICU stay
Drug: Crystalloids
Any crystalloids given for correction of hypovolemia during all ICU stay
|
|
Experimental: 2
Colloids, including albumin, gelatines, starch any other synthetic colloids
|
Drug: Colloids
Gelatines, Albumine, Starch, or any other colloids, at the necessary dose to restore hemodynamic (starch cumulative daily dose should not exceed 35/40 ml/kg), for all ICU stay
Drug: Colloids
Any colloids given for correction of hypovolemia during all ICU stay
|
Show Detailed Description
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Males and females, above the legal age of consent
- Hospitalized in intensive care unit
- Need fluid resuscitation (according to the physician in charge of the patient)
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients who have one or more of the following items:
- Known allergy to gelatins, albumin or starch
- Coagulation disorders (haemophilia, Willebrand disease, etc.)
- Chronic renal failure on permanent dialysis
- Severe hepatic failure
- Burns > 20 % of body surface
- Pregnancy
- Volume replacement: As a part of anaesthesia, for anaphylactic shock, or for dehydration
- Brain death
- Advance directive of withholding or withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments
- Any other investigational drugs
Contacts and Locations| Contact: Djillali Annane, MD, PhD | 331 47 10 77 87 | djillali.annane@rpc.aphp.fr |
Show 72 Study Locations| Study Chair: | Djillali Annane, MD, PhD | Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris - University of Versailles |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Djillali Annane, Professor in medicine, University of Versailles |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00318942 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | AOM01020, P010308 |
| Study First Received: | September 2, 2005 |
| Last Updated: | May 21, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | France: Afssaps - Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des produits de santé (Saint-Denis) France: Ministry of Health |
Keywords provided by University of Versailles:
|
Sepsis Multiple Trauma Hypovolemic Shock |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Critical Illness Disease Attributes Pathologic Processes |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 16, 2013