Effects of Inspiration Rise Time on Work of Breathing and Comfort of Conscious Patients on Mechanical Ventilation
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Introduction Pressure Support Ventilation is widely used in patients in the ICU. Matching the patient's respiratory needs with adequate ventilator settings is necessary to ensure a low work of breathing (WOB) and maximal patient comfort. The inspiratory rise time (IRT) determines the time to reach the selected airway pressure. A short IRT results in a high peak inspiratory flow and a short time to reach that peak, but is also associated with the development of turbulent flow, resulting in increased WOB. Aim of this study is to investigate the effects of different IRT settings on WOB and patient comfort during pressure support ventilation.
Methods We will performed a prospective, single blind cohort study in patients on Pressure Support Ventilation. 10 healthy adult patients admitted to the ICU after elective facial or neck surgery will be included. All patients will be ventilated in pressure support mode using a Servo 300 ventilator (Siemens. Elema, Solna, Sweden), with a positive end expiratory pressure of 5 cm H2O, pressure support level of 12 cm H2O above PEEP and an inspiratory oxygen fraction of 0.40. Patients have to be awake and cooperative (Ramsay 2). WOB will be measured with an esophageal balloon, and miniature flowmeter (Bicore system). Breathing comfort will be evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 1 to 10. WOB and patient comfort will be measured (in random order) at 0, 5, and 10% IRT. For statistical analysis the two-way analysis of variance will used. A p value of < 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Mechanical Ventilation |
Procedure: pressure support ventilation at 0, 5, and 10% IRT |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment Masking: Single Blind |
- Work of breathing
- patient comfort
| Estimated Enrollment: | 10 |
| Study Start Date: | February 2006 |
| Study Completion Date: | March 2008 |
Introduction Pressure Support Ventilation is widely used in patients in the ICU. Matching the patient's respiratory needs with adequate ventilator settings is necessary to ensure a low work of breathing (WOB) and maximal patient comfort. The inspiratory rise time (IRT) determines the time to reach the selected airway pressure. A short IRT results in a high peak inspiratory flow and a short time to reach that peak, but is also associated with the development of turbulent flow, resulting in increased WOB. Aim of this study is to investigate the effects of different IRT settings on WOB and patient comfort during pressure support ventilation.
Methods We will performed a prospective, single blind cohort study in patients on Pressure Support Ventilation. 10 healthy adult patients admitted to the ICU after elective facial or neck surgery will be included. All patients will be ventilated in pressure support mode using a Servo 300 ventilator (Siemens. Elema, Solna, Sweden), with a positive end expiratory pressure of 5 cm H2O, pressure support level of 12 cm H2O above PEEP and an inspiratory oxygen fraction of 0.40. Patients have to be awake and cooperative (Ramsay 2). WOB will be measured with an esophageal balloon, and miniature flowmeter (Bicore system). Breathing comfort will be evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 1 to 10. WOB and patient comfort will be measured (in random order) at 0, 5, and 10% IRT. For statistical analysis the two-way analysis of variance will used. A p value of < 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- awake and cooperative patient
- ICU admission following surgery of head or neck
Exclusion Criteria:
- coagulopathy
- inability to sit
- hypoxemia and/or hypercapnia and /or hypocapnia
- Pain score > 5 (on scale 1-10)
- esophageal abnormalities
- Pregnancy
- COPD
Contacts and Locations| Netherlands | |
| Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre | |
| Nijmegen, Netherlands, 6500 HB | |
| Principal Investigator: | Cornelia WE Hoedemaekers, MD PhD | Radboud University |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00294879 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | LBCH 0601 |
| Study First Received: | February 21, 2006 |
| Last Updated: | May 30, 2008 |
| Health Authority: | Netherlands: The Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects (CCMO) |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 19, 2013