The MAX Study: Mitomycin C, Avastin and Xeloda in Patients With Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Although it is possible to cure bowel cancer when it is detected at an early stage, in many cases it may spread to involve other organs and in these cases is generally incurable. Chemotherapy prolongs survival and improves quality of life in such patients, but standard chemotherapy for this disease has not been defined.
There are several possible chemotherapy treatments for patients with bowel cancer, which has spread to other organs. However, these treatments are only partly effective and only work for a limited period of time. Most treatments are associated with a number of possible side effects which may have a detrimental effect on quality of life. Thus, it is imperative that more effective treatments with the lowest possible risk of side effects are developed.
Previous studies have shown that the addition of a new type of antibody treatment (bevacizumab) to an intensive combination chemotherapy regimen improved survival in patients with advanced bowel cancer and extended the time before tumours began to grow. However, intensive chemotherapy is likely to only be a suitable treatment for a proportion of patients with bowel cancer, because intensive chemotherapy causes a high rate of side effects.
This study compares a gentle chemotherapy treatment (capecitabine chemotherapy tablets given by mouth) with the combination of capecitabine and bevacizumab and the combination of capecitabine, bevacizumab and intravenous mitomycin C.
It is expected that a gentle chemotherapy treatment or a gentle chemotherapy treatment combined with bevacizumab would be an appropriate treatment for both young and fit patients as well as older and less fit patients who would not easily tolerate intensive chemotherapy.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer |
Drug: Mitomycin C; Capecitabine; Bevacizumab |
Phase 2 Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | The MAX Study: A Randomised Phase II/III Study to Evaluate the Role of Mitomycin C, Avastin and Xeloda in Patients With Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer |
- Phase II: - treatment related toxicity
- Phase III: - progression free survival
- Phase II: - treatment response
- Phase III:
- - treatment related toxicity
- - treatment response
- - overall survival
- - symptoms of disease, treatment and quality of life
- - cost of therapy and assessment of gain in quality-adjusted progression free survival
| Estimated Enrollment: | 333 |
| Study Start Date: | June 2005 |
| Study Completion Date: | July 2007 |
Show Detailed Description
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Histological diagnosis of colorectal cancer
- Metastatic disease that is not resectable
- Age > 18 years
- Any patient in whom the investigator considers capecitabine monotherapy appropriate
- Measurable and/or non-measurable disease as assessed by CT scan
- ECOG performance status 0, 1 or 2. Patients with PS2 should have serum albumin >30 g/L
- No prior chemotherapy except for adjuvant chemotherapy given in association with (i) complete resection of primary colon or rectal cancer provided there is no clinical, radiological or biochemical evidence of relapse for at least 6 months after completion of adjuvant treatment and/or (ii) complete resection of limited colorectal metastases to liver and/or lung provided there is no clinical, radiological or biochemical evidence of relapse for at least 6 months after completion of adjuvant treatment
- Adequate bone marrow function with platelets > 100 X 109/l; neutrophils > 1.5 X 109/l i) Adequate renal function, with calculated creatinine clearance >30 ml/min (Cockcroft and Gault). For patients with creatinine clearance <50 ml/min the starting dose of capecitabine may not be greater than 2000 mg/m2/d (see Section 7.1)
- Adequate hepatic function with serum total bilirubin < 1.5 X upper limit of normal range
- Life expectancy of at least 12 weeks
- No other concurrent uncontrolled medical conditions
- No other malignant disease apart from non-melanotic skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix or any other cancer treated with curative intent >2 years previously without evidence of relapse
- Women and partners of women of childbearing potential must agree to use adequate contraception
- Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Medical or psychiatric conditions that compromise the patient's ability to give informed consent or to complete the protocol
- Patients with a lack of physical integrity of the upper gastrointestinal tract, or known malabsorption syndromes.
- Uncontrolled hypertension
- Active bleeding disorders within the last 3 months
- Patients on full anticoagulation with warfarin. (Patients who require full anticoagulation and who wish to participate in the study should be converted to low molecular weight heparin). (Note: patients receiving full anticoagulation with low molecular weight heparin should have no evidence of tumour invading or abutting major blood vessels on any prior CT scan)
- Participation in any investigational drug study within the previous 8 weeks
- Patients with uncontrolled clinically significant cardiac disease, arrhythmias or angina pectoris
- Patients with a history of acute myocardial infarction or cerebrovascular accident within the last 12 months
- Regular use of aspirin (>325mg/day) or NSAIDs (low dose aspirin (<325 mg/d), or occasional use of NSAIDs is acceptable)
- CNS metastases
- Major surgical procedure within the last 28 days
- Serious non-healing wound, ulcer or bone fracture
- 24 hour urinary protein > 2g/ 24 hours ( performed if urine dipstick > 1+ )
- Pregnancy or lactation
Contacts and Locations| Australia, New South Wales | |
| Lismore Hospital | |
| Lismore, New South Wales, Australia | |
| Newcastle Mater Hospital | |
| Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia | |
| Bankstown Hospital | |
| Sydney, New South Wales, Australia | |
| Liverpool Hospital | |
| Sydney, New South Wales, Australia | |
| Nepean Hospital | |
| Sydney, New South Wales, Australia | |
| Campbelltown Hospital | |
| Sydney, New South Wales, Australia | |
| North Shore Private Hospital | |
| Sydney, New South Wales, Australia | |
| Prince of Wales Hospital | |
| Sydney, New South Wales, Australia | |
| Royal North Shore Hosp | |
| Sydney, New South Wales, Australia | |
| Sydney Cancer Centre, Concord Repat General Hospital | |
| Sydney, New South Wales, Australia | |
| Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital | |
| Sydney, New South Wales, Australia | |
| Westmead Hospital | |
| Sydney, New South Wales, Australia | |
| St George Hospital | |
| Sydney, New South Wales, Australia | |
| Tamworth Base Hospital | |
| Tamworth, New South Wales, Australia | |
| Tweed Heads Hospital | |
| Tweed Heads, New South Wales, Australia | |
| Southern Medical Daycare | |
| Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia | |
| Australia, Queensland | |
| Royal Brisbane Hospital | |
| Brisbane, Queensland, Australia | |
| Australia, South Australia | |
| Flinders Medical Centre | |
| Adelaide, South Australia, Australia | |
| Queen Elizabeth Hospital / Lyell McEwin Centre | |
| Adelaide, South Australia, Australia | |
| Royal Adelaide Hospital | |
| Adelaide, South Australia, Australia | |
| Australia, Tasmania | |
| Royal Hobart Hospital | |
| Hobart, Tasmania, Australia | |
| Australia, Victoria | |
| Bendigo Public Hospital | |
| Bendigo, Victoria, Australia | |
| Geelong Hospital | |
| Geelong, Victoria, Australia | |
| Frankston Hospital | |
| Melbourne, Victoria, Australia | |
| Monash Medical Centre | |
| Melbourne, Victoria, Australia | |
| Austin Health | |
| Melbourne, Victoria, Australia | |
| Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute | |
| Melbourne, Victoria, Australia | |
| Box Hill Hospital | |
| Melbourne, Victoria, Australia | |
| St Vincent's Hospital | |
| Melbourne, Victoria, Australia | |
| Border Medical Oncology | |
| Wodonga, Victoria, Australia | |
| Australia, Western Australia | |
| Fremantle Hospital | |
| Perth, Western Australia, Australia | |
| Royal Perth Hospital | |
| Perth, Western Australia, Australia | |
| Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital | |
| Perth, Western Australia, Australia | |
| St John of God Hospital, Subiaco | |
| Perth, Western Australia, Australia | |
| New Zealand | |
| Christchurch Hospital | |
| Christchurch, New Zealand | |
| Palmerston North Hospital | |
| Palmerston, New Zealand | |
| Principal Investigator: | Niall C Tebbutt, BA (Hons) BM BCh PhD MRCP FRAC | Ludwig Oncology Unit, Austin Health |
More Information
No publications provided
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00294359 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | AG0501CR |
| Study First Received: | February 21, 2006 |
| Last Updated: | August 21, 2007 |
| Health Authority: | Australia: Department of Health and Ageing Therapeutic Goods Administration |
Keywords provided by Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group:
|
colorectal neoplasm |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Colorectal Neoplasms Intestinal Neoplasms Gastrointestinal Neoplasms Digestive System Neoplasms Neoplasms by Site Neoplasms Digestive System Diseases Gastrointestinal Diseases Colonic Diseases Intestinal Diseases Rectal Diseases Mitomycins Mitomycin Capecitabine Bevacizumab |
Antibiotics, Antineoplastic Antineoplastic Agents Therapeutic Uses Pharmacologic Actions Nucleic Acid Synthesis Inhibitors Enzyme Inhibitors Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Alkylating Agents Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic Antimetabolites Angiogenesis Inhibitors Angiogenesis Modulating Agents Growth Substances Physiological Effects of Drugs Growth Inhibitors |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 21, 2013