Randomized Fixed Bearing vs Mobile Bearing Cruciate Substituting TKA
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
DePuy Orthopaedics
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
DePuy Orthopaedics
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00289107
First received: February 7, 2006
Last updated: September 30, 2011
Last verified: September 2011
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The study will evaluate the clinical performance of the rotating platform and fixed bearing implants through patient questionnaires, outcomes scoring and radiographic assessment.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Total Knee Replacement |
Device: Total Knee Arthroplasty Device: Total knee replacement |
Phase 4 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Subject) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Multi-center, Prospective, Clinical Evaluation of the P.F.C.® Sigma™ Rotating Platform Cruciate Substituting vs P.F.C.® Sigma™ Cruciate Substituting Knee Primary Cases |
Resource links provided by NLM:
Further study details as provided by DePuy Orthopaedics:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- Knee Society Score [ Time Frame: Pre-operative, 6 and 12 months and annually thereafter for at least 5 years. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The Knee Society Score (KSS) is comprised to two sections (each worth 100 points) for a maximum 200 points. One section is the Knee Society Clinical Score (KSCS) - points are given for pain, motion, and stability and points are deducted for flexion contracture, extension lag, and misalignment. The other section is the Knee Society Functional Score (KSFS) - points are assigned for walking distances and climbing stairs and points are deducted for use of walking aids. For each section, a score of 80-100 = excellent, 70-79 = good; 60-69 = fair; and < 60 = poor.
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- Complications [ Time Frame: On-going to end of study ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Revisions [ Time Frame: On-going to end of study ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Medical Imaging [ Time Frame: Pre-operative, 6 and 12 months and annually thereafter for at least 5 years. ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- SF-12 Patient Outcomes [ Time Frame: Pre-operative, 6 and 12 months and annually thereafter for at least 5 years. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Enrollment: | 149 |
| Study Start Date: | May 2001 |
| Study Completion Date: | September 2009 |
| Primary Completion Date: | September 2009 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: 1
P.F.C.® Sigma™ Rotating Platform Cruciate Substituting Knee System
|
Device: Total Knee Arthroplasty
Rotating Platform (RP) Cruciate Substituting Knee System
Other Name: P.F.C.® Sigma™ RP Cruciate Substituting Knee System
|
|
Active Comparator: 2
P.F.C.® Sigma™ Fixed Cruciate Substituting Knee System
|
Device: Total knee replacement
Fixed Cruciate Substituting Knee System
Other Name: P.F.C.® Sigma™ Fixed Cruciate Substituting Knee System
|
Detailed Description:
The study will evaluate the clinical performance of rotating platform and fixed bearing cruciate ligament substituting implants by obtaining a series of primary TKAS. Patients will receive either the P.F.C.® Sigma™ Rotating Platform Cruciate Substituting Knee System or P.F.C.® Sigma™ Fixed Cruciate Substituting Knee System and assignment is randomized.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 75 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Osteoarthritis
- Rheumatoid arthritis
- Other inflammatory arthritis
- Avascular necrosis (AVN) of bone
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of recent/active joint sepsis.
- Charcot neuropathy.
- Psycho-social disorders that would limit rehabilitation.
- Greater than 75 years of age at the time of surgery.
- Prior ipsilateral knee arthroplasty.
- Metabolic disorders of calcified tissues, such as Paget's disease.
- Severe diabetes mellitus.
- Joint replacement due to autoimmune disorders.
- Skeletal immaturity
Contacts and Locations
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | DePuy Orthopaedics |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00289107 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | SRP-3 |
| Study First Received: | February 7, 2006 |
| Results First Received: | September 29, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | September 30, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Keywords provided by DePuy Orthopaedics:
|
Total Knee Replacement Knee Prosthesis |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 16, 2013