Predicting Patients' Response to Spinal Manipulation
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical effectiveness of two types of chiropractic spinal manipulation to conservative medical care for patients at least 55 years old with sub-acute or chronic LBP.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Low Back Pain |
Procedure: Spinal Manipulation |
Phase 2 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Investigator) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Predicting Patients' Response to Spinal Manipulation |
- Roland Morris Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire [ Time Frame: 6 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- To measure treatment ranges and velocities of lumbar motion [ Time Frame: 6 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- To measure the posterior-to-anterior stiffness of the lumbar spine [ Time Frame: 6 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- To measure standing postural sway characteristics [ Time Frame: 6 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- To measure the neuromuscular response to a sudden load [ Time Frame: 6 weels ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- To measure resting surface electromyographic (EMG) activity of the lumbar musculature [ Time Frame: 6 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Enrollment: | 240 |
| Study Start Date: | July 2004 |
| Study Completion Date: | March 2007 |
| Primary Completion Date: | October 2006 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: 1
HVLA-SM, Experimental, high-velocity low amplitude spinal manipulation
|
Procedure: Spinal Manipulation
HVLA-SM, LVVA-SM
Other Name: Celebrex, Aleve, Bextra, Naptoxen,
|
|
Experimental: 2
LVVA-SM, Experimental, low velocity variable amplitude spinal manipulation
|
Procedure: Spinal Manipulation
HVLA-SM, LVVA-SM
Other Name: Celebrex, Aleve, Bextra, Naptoxen,
|
|
Active Comparator: 3
Usual Medical Care, Active Comparator, advice, exercises and medications
|
Procedure: Spinal Manipulation
HVLA-SM, LVVA-SM
Other Name: Celebrex, Aleve, Bextra, Naptoxen,
|
Detailed Description:
Despite the high prevalence of LBP and the associated economic costs, disability, and lost productivity, and despite the development of several treatment guidelines, one of which recommends chiropractic spinal manipulation for some subgroups of patients with back pain, the management of LBP remains controversial and highly variable across professions and geographic regions. Although one recent publication describes the design of chiropractic and exercise for seniors with low back or neck pain, no published studies, to our knowledge, have assessed the effectiveness of chiropractic manipulation compared to medical care for older adults with sub-acute or chronic low back pain.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 21 Years to 55 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 21 to 55
- Idiopathic mechanical low back pain (LBP) matching classification 1-4 of the Quebec Task Force.
- LBP classified as subacute (onset 4-12 weeks previous) or chronic (onset more than 12 weeks previous), with the current episode occurring at least four weeks prior to the date of contact with the clinic: In order to exclude the greatest proportion of LBP patients that have a favorable natural history of improvement.
- Written Informed Consent
- A minimum baseline score on the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMQ) of 6 points.
Exclusion Criteria:
- LBP from other somatic tissues as determined by history, examination, and course (e.g. pain referred from visceral conditions).
- LBP diagnosis not meeting Classifications 1 through 4 of the Quebec Task Force, especially the following: low back pain associated with frank radiculopathy defined as typical shooting leg pain; positive straight leg-raising test; an altered lower extremity reflex; a dermatomal sensory deficit; at least one of the following: progressive unilateral muscle weakness or motor loss, or symptoms of cauda equina compression; and CT or MRI evidence of related anatomical pathology (e.g. abnormal disc, stenosis).
- Co-morbid pathology or poor health conditions in patients; Co-morbid conditions and general poor health significantly complicate the prognosis of LBP, and inject a variety of uncontrollable factors in case-management, not to mention experimental analysis and interpretation. Patients who have case histories and physical examination findings indicating other that average good health will be excluded from the study.
- Bone and joint pathology contraindicating patient for SM of the lumbar spine and pelvis: Patients with spinal fractures, tumors, infections, arthropathies, and significant osteoporosis will be referred to appropriate health care.
- Other contraindications for SM of the lumbar spine and pelvis (e.g. bleeding disorders or anticoagulant therapy, extreme obesity).
- Retention of legal advice related to this or a previous LBP episode: Patients with occupational or personal injuries will not be automatically excluded from the study unless they answer yes to a specific question about the retention of legal advice with respect to their LBP episode at the baseline interview.
- Pregnancy: Pregnancy is a contraindication for exposing a patient to ionizing radiation and is a confounding factor in the usual course of LBP.
- Inability to read or verbally comprehend English.
- Clear evidence of narcotic or other drug abuse as determined by history and examination: injects significant confounding factors with respect to internal validity and feasibility.
- Major clinical depression: Patients with scores greater than 17 on the Beck Depression Inventory will be excluded from the study. Patients with evidence of other psychiatric disorders as determined by history and exam will also be excluded.
- Use of manipulative care for any reason within the past 3 months as determined by history: to exclude the possibility of carryover effects.
- Unwillingness to postpone use of all other types of manual treatment for LBP except those provided in the study (including chiropractic and osteopathic SM, physical therapy, and massage) for the duration of the study period: to eliminate confounding effects.
Contacts and Locations| United States, Iowa | |
| Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research | |
| Davenport, Iowa, United States, 52803 | |
| Principal Investigator: | William C Meeker, DC, M.P.H. | Palmer Chiropractic College |
| Principal Investigator: | David Wilder, PhD | The University of Iowa |
More Information
No publications provided by Palmer College of Chiropractic
Additional publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
| Responsible Party: | William C. Meeker, Palmer College of Chiropractic |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00285649 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | U19P3, U19 AT0002006 |
| Study First Received: | January 31, 2006 |
| Last Updated: | August 31, 2009 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Keywords provided by Palmer College of Chiropractic:
|
Spinal Manipulation |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Back Pain Low Back Pain Pain |
Neurologic Manifestations Nervous System Diseases Signs and Symptoms |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 16, 2013