Primary Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Replacement Versus Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing in Young Active Patients
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
University Hospital, Ghent
Information provided by:
University Hospital, Ghent
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00285129
First received: January 31, 2006
Last updated: December 19, 2007
Last verified: December 2007
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Comparison of the functional result and speed of rehabilitation between two types of hip prostheses: primary ceramic-on-ceramic total hip replacement versus metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Indications for a Total Hip Prosthesis |
Device: ceramic-on-ceramic total hip replacement versus metal-on-metal hip resurfacing |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Primary Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Replacement Versus Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing in Young Active Patients |
Resource links provided by NLM:
Further study details as provided by University Hospital, Ghent:
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 65 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Total hip replacement
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Contacts and Locations
More Information
Additional Information:
No publications provided
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00285129 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 2004/338 |
| Study First Received: | January 31, 2006 |
| Last Updated: | December 19, 2007 |
| Health Authority: | Belgium: Institutional Review Board |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 16, 2013