SAVEPACe - Search AV Extension and Managed Ventricular Pacing for Promoting Atrio-Ventricular Conduction
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
SAVE PACe is a large, prospective, single-blinded, randomized clinical trial with the main objective to study the effect of unnecessary right ventricular apical pacing on the clinical outcome of time to development of persistent AF.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Sick Sinus Syndrome Heart Failure, Congestive Atrial Fibrillation Bradycardia Ventricular Dysfunction |
Device: Implantable Pulse Generators |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Subject) Primary Purpose: Prevention |
| Official Title: | Search AV Extension and Managed Ventricular Pacing for Promoting Atrio-Ventricular Conduction (SAVE PACe) |
- To compare the time to development of persistent AF between all randomized subjects in the ON and OFF arms. [ Time Frame: from Jan 2003 to Dec 2006 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- To compare composite endpoint of AF and heart failure hospitalization (HFH), HFH, cardiovascular health care utilization, symptoms, HF medications, cumulative %, adverse events and incidence of stroke between the arms. [ Time Frame: from Jan 2003 to Dec 2006 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Enrollment: | 1070 |
| Study Start Date: | January 2003 |
| Study Completion Date: | February 2008 |
| Primary Completion Date: | December 2006 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: 1
dual-chamber minimal ventricular pacing with the use of new pacemaker features designed to promote atrioventricular conduction, preserve ventricular conduction, and prevent ventricular desynchronization
|
Device: Implantable Pulse Generators
dual-chamber minimal ventricular pacing with the use of new pacemaker features designed to promote atrioventricular conduction, preserve ventricular conduction, and prevent ventricular desynchronization
Other Names:
|
|
No Intervention: 2
conventional dual-chamber pacing
|
Detailed Description:
Conventional dual-chamber pacing maintains atrioventricular synchrony but results in high percentages of ventricular pacing, which causes ventricular desynchronization and has been linked to an increased risk of atrial fibrillation in patients with sinus-node disease.
Patients with sinus-node disease and intact atrioventricular conduction are randomly assigned to receive conventional dual-chamber pacing or dual-chamber minimal ventricular pacing with the use of new Medtronic pacemaker features designed to promote atrioventricular conduction, preserve ventricular conduction, and prevent ventricular desynchronization. The primary end point was time to persistent atrial fibrillation.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years of age and older
- Willing and able to give informed consent
- Willing and able to comply with the study follow-up schedule
- Class I/ClassII indications for dual chamber pacing
- Initial implant of a Kappa 700, Kappa 900, EnPulse, or EnRhythm dual chamber IPG
- Demonstrate 1 to 1 conduction and a QRS interval of < 120ms at 100 beats per minutes for a period of nine seconds while atrial pacing
Exclusion Criteria:
- Less than 18 years of age
- Unwilling or unable to give informed consent
- Unwilling or unable to commit to follow-up schedule
- Medical conditions that would preclude the testing required by the protocol or limit study participation
- Enrolled or intend to participate in another clinical trial during the course of this study
- A life expectancy of less than 2 years
- History of continuous atrial fibrillation for the 6 months prior to screen visit
- Two or more cardioversions, chemical or electrical, within the past 6 months prior to screen
- History of persistent second or third degree atrioventricular block
- A prior implant of pacemaker or defibrillator device
- A baseline, pre-paced QRS >120 ms on surface ECG
- Failure of the 1 to 1 atrioventricular conduction test
- Anticipated major cardiac surgery within the course of the study
Contacts and Locations
Show 67 Study Locations| Principal Investigator: | Michael O. Sweeney, MD | Brigham and Women's Hospital |
More Information
Publications:
| Responsible Party: | Medtronic CRDM Clinical Research |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00284830 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 191 |
| Study First Received: | January 31, 2006 |
| Last Updated: | February 26, 2008 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Keywords provided by Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm Disease Management:
|
Right Ventricular Pacing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Atrioventricular Conduction Heart Failure Hospitalization |
Cardiovascular Health Care Utilization Sinus-node Disease Minimized Ventricular Pacing |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Atrial Fibrillation Heart Failure Sick Sinus Syndrome Ventricular Dysfunction Bradycardia Arrhythmias, Cardiac |
Heart Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases Pathologic Processes Arrhythmia, Sinus Heart Block |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 16, 2013