Use of Sirolimus vs. Tacrolimus For African-American Renal Transplant Recipients
Recruitment status was Active, not recruiting
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of Sirolimus (Rapamune) in improving the function of the transplant kidney, without any increase in the risk of acute rejection or adverse side effects, compared with Tacrolimus (Prograf).
We hypothesize that Sirolimus, as one component of a long-term steroid-free immunosuppressive regimen, will be effective in maintaining a low incidence of acute rejection and a short- and long-term graft survival comparable to Tacrolimus with better graft function in the high-risk African-American renal transplant population with immediate graft function.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Kidney Transplantation |
Drug: Rapamune and Prograf |
Phase 4 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Use of Sirolimus Vs. Tacrolimus As The Primary Agent In Immunosuppressive Regimen For African-American Renal Allograft Recipients With Immediate Graft Function: A Pilot Study |
- Renal function at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post transplant.
- Incidence of acute rejection.
| Estimated Enrollment: | 40 |
| Study Start Date: | January 2004 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | June 2009 |
It has been repeatedly demonstrated that African-American renal allograft recipients have worse graft outcomes when compared with Caucasians. This has been attributed to various immunologic and non-immunologic factors, including a greater rate of acute rejection, resistance to standard doses of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) and corticosteroids, different pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles, and noncompliance. It has therefore been suggested that quadruple immunosuppression, including antilymphocyte antibodies for induction, should be used in this high-risk population to improve graft survival. CNIs are currently the mainstay of immunosuppressive regimens. Tacrolimus has been shown to be significantly more effective than Cyclosporine A in preventing acute rejection. As a result, Tacrolimus has become the CNI of choice in preventing acute rejection, and has produced similar graft survival rates at one year, with higher creatinine clearances. However, there is no report examining the efficacy of Sirolimus in improving renal function and its side effect profile when compared with Tacrolimus in renal allograft recipients, particularly in African-Americans with immediate graft function in a steroid-free environment.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- African-American living- or deceased-donor renal transplant at least 18 years of age with current and historical negative crossmatch who demonstrate urine output > 60 ml/hr and fall in serum creatinine > 20%/day during the first 48 hours posttransplant, without need for dialysis.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Unwillingness to participate in the study
- Current PRA > 20%
- Noncompliance with the protocol and follow-up visits
- Those who need to be on maintenance steroids due to underlying disease
- Known hypersensitivity to study drugs
- Pregnancy
- Pre-transplant leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, hypercholesterolemia, or hypertriglyceridemia despite optimal medical therapy
- HIV positive recipients.
Contacts and Locations| United States, Michigan | |
| Detroit Medical Center, Harper University Hospital | |
| Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48201 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Scott A. Gruber, MD, PhD | Harper University Hospital |
More Information
No publications provided
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00252655 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 122102M1F |
| Study First Received: | November 9, 2005 |
| Last Updated: | April 18, 2007 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Sirolimus Tacrolimus Antibiotics, Antineoplastic Antineoplastic Agents Therapeutic Uses Pharmacologic Actions |
Antifungal Agents Anti-Infective Agents Immunosuppressive Agents Immunologic Factors Physiological Effects of Drugs Anti-Bacterial Agents |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 22, 2013