Writing About Disease: Effect on Rehabilitation?
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Therapeutic writing about one's emotions has been described previously (J Pennebaker: Emotions, disclosure and health. Am Psychol. Assoc 1995). The present project will compare the effects (if any) of writing about the emotional versus the physical consequences of lung disease on anxiety, perceived quality of life, and perceived health status.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
COPD Asthma |
Procedure: writing about disease |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label |
| Official Title: | Writing About Disease: Effect on Rehabilitation? |
- Quality of life [ Time Frame: prospective ]
- Perceived health status [ Time Frame: prospective ]
- Trait anxiety [ Time Frame: prospective ]
- Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) [ Time Frame: prospective ]
- 6-minute walking distance [ Time Frame: prospective ]
| Estimated Enrollment: | 180 |
| Study Start Date: | December 2005 |
| Study Completion Date: | December 2007 |
-
Procedure: writing about disease
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients (age 35-70) and asthma patients (age 20-60) referred to a 4 weeks inpatient rehabilitation program - who agree to participate in the project - are randomly assigned to one of three conditions:
- Writing about emotional consequences of their disease before the program starts
- Writing about physical consequences of their disease before the program starts
- Not writing
All patients are measured (completing questionnaires at home) on: perceived quality of life, perceived health status and trait anxiety - 2 weeks before the program, 2 weeks after the program and 6 months after the program. FEV1 and 6 min walking distance are measured at the beginning and by the end of the program.
In addition to questionnaires, all patients are asked to:
- Write in their own words ( 2 weeks after) to evaluate their stay at the rehabilitation clinic; and
- Write in their own words (6 months after) about how the disease affects their life at that point.
Both quantitative and qualitative data will be used for analysis purposes.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 20 Years to 70 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Clinical diagnosis of COPD (age between 35 and 70)
- Clinical diagnosis of asthma (age between 20 and 60)
Contacts and Locations| Norway | |
| Glittreklinikken | |
| Hakadal, Akershus, Norway, 1485 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Einar Haave, Cand Psychol | LHL Helse |
More Information
No publications provided
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00251420 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | G22-1 |
| Study First Received: | November 9, 2005 |
| Last Updated: | May 6, 2009 |
| Health Authority: | Norway:National Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics |
Keywords provided by LHL Helse:
|
copd asthma QoL Perceived health status Trait anxiety |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Asthma Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive Bronchial Diseases Respiratory Tract Diseases Lung Diseases, Obstructive |
Lung Diseases Respiratory Hypersensitivity Hypersensitivity, Immediate Hypersensitivity Immune System Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 16, 2013