Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Acute Respiratory Infection Smart Form
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
To evaluate the effectiveness of the Acute Respiratory Infection Smart Form
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Respiratory Tract Infections |
Behavioral: Smart Form |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Evaluating Smart Forms and Quality Dashboards in an EHR: Effectiveness of the Acute Respiratory Infection Smart Form |
- Antibiotic prescribing rates [ Time Frame: 9 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing, re-visit rates, antibiotic costs, use of antibiotics, all-cause antibiotic use, quality of documentation [ Time Frame: 9 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Enrollment: | 18257 |
| Study Start Date: | November 2005 |
| Study Completion Date: | August 2007 |
| Primary Completion Date: | May 2006 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
1
Intervention
|
Behavioral: Smart Form
Computer Decision Support System
|
|
No Intervention: 2
Control
|
Behavioral: Smart Form
Computer Decision Support System
|
Detailed Description:
Specific Aim 1: To design and implement an integrated documentation-based clinical decision support and physician feedback system, provided in an electronic health record (EHR), to improve the management of patients with acute medical conditions.
Hypothesis 1: A documentation-based clinical decision support tool (CDSS) "smart form" physician feedback system, can be designed and implemented to facilitate documentation and physician order-entry, provide individualized, evidence-based recommendations for the management of patients acute respiratory infections (ARIs), and are usable by primary care physicians.
Specific Aim 2: To determine the effectiveness of documentation-based CDSS and physician feedback on documentation and the clinical management of patients respiratory tract infections.
Hypothesis 2A: A documentation-based CDSS "smart form" will increase the documentation of important clinical data in patients with ARI when compared to usual practice.
Hypothesis 2B: A documentation-based CDSS "smart form" will increase adherence with guidelines for the management of patients with ARI when compared to usual practice.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
Acute Respiratory Infection visit
Exclusion Criteria:
Any patients who are not part of a panel of a participating physician
Contacts and Locations
More Information
No publications provided by Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Additional publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
| Responsible Party: | Blackford Middleton, M.D., M.P.H, M.Sc., Partners Healthcare Systems, Inc. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00235040 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | R01HS015169-1, R01 HS015169 |
| Study First Received: | October 6, 2005 |
| Last Updated: | January 24, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Federal Government |
Keywords provided by Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ):
|
Upper Respiratory Infections Respiratory Tract Infections Tree Number C01.539.739 Tree Number C08.730 Unique ID D012141 |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Respiratory Tract Infections Infection Respiratory Tract Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 16, 2013