Renal Function Evaluation After Reduction of Cyclosporine A Dose in Renal Transplant Patients (DICAM)
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
University Hospital, Rouen
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
University Hospital, Rouen
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00213590
First received: September 13, 2005
Last updated: February 14, 2012
Last verified: February 2012
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of the study is to show the efficacy of reduction of cyclosporine A exposure measured by the area under the curve by Bayesian estimator on the primary prevention of degradation of the renal function in renal transplant recipients
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Kidney Transplantation Primary Prevention Kidney Failure |
Drug: cyclosporine A |
Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Multicentric, Randomized, Opened Study to Evaluate Efficacy on Renal Function of an Immunosuppressant Regimen Based on Cyclosporine A Dose Reduction in Combination With Mycophenolate Mofetil, From the Second Year of Renal Transplantation |
Resource links provided by NLM:
Further study details as provided by University Hospital, Rouen:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- renal function at two years [ Time Frame: every two months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- proteinuria [ Time Frame: every two months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- hypertension [ Time Frame: every two months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- hemodialysis [ Time Frame: at any time during the study period ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- nephrotoxicity [ Time Frame: at any time during the study period ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- chronic renal dysfunction [ Time Frame: at two years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- biopsy proven late acute rejection [ Time Frame: at any time during the study period ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- dyslipidemia [ Time Frame: every six months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- patient survival [ Time Frame: at two years ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- graft survival [ Time Frame: at two years ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- severe infection with hospitalisation [ Time Frame: at any time during the study period ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- post transplant lymphoproliferative disorder [ Time Frame: at any time during the study period ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- cutaneous carcinoma [ Time Frame: every year ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- area under the concentration-time of cyclosporine A [ Time Frame: every two months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- area under the concentration-time of mycophenolate mofetil [ Time Frame: at month 0 6 12 and 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- biodisponibility of mycophenolate mofetil after reduction of cyclosporine A exposure [ Time Frame: at month 6 12 and 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Enrollment: | 208 |
| Study Start Date: | April 2000 |
| Study Completion Date: | November 2006 |
| Primary Completion Date: | November 2006 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: 1
the usual-exposure group, the cyclosporine AUC0-12h target was 4.3 (3.5 to 4.8, range) mg•h/L
|
|
|
Experimental: 2
the low-exposure group the cyclosporine AUC0-12h target was 50% usual target or 2.2 (2.0 to 2.6, range) mg•h/L
|
Drug: cyclosporine A
The usual-exposure level was based on the mean area-under-the-concentration-time curve (AUC0-12h). In the usual-exposure group, the cyclosporine AUC0-12h target was 4.3 (3.5 to 4.8, range) mg•h/L and in the low-exposure group the target was 50% or 2.2 (2.0 to 2.6, range) mg•h/L. Ranges were asymmetrical for safety reasons, i.e., to prevent the occurrence of rejection in the low-exposure arm and nephrotoxicity in the usual-exposure arm.The AUC 0-12h was estimated using a Bayesian estimator and a three-point limited sampling strategy (0, 1, and 3 hours). A computer program was used to calculate the dose adjustment required to reach the therapeutic target. Doses were adjusted in increments of 25% to reach the target within 2 months. Cyclosporine AUC0-12h was determined every 2 months.
Other Name: cyclosporine microemulsion Neoral Novartis Basel Switzerland
|
Show Detailed Description
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 75 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- first or second renal graft
- cadaveric renal graft
- second year of renal transplantation
- stable renal function
- moderate renal dysfunction risk
- bitherapy with cyclosporine A and mycophenolate mofetil
- corticosteroid withdrawal since 3 months at less
Exclusion Criteria:
- 2 or more acute rejection episodes
- PRA> 80%
- serum creatinine> 250µmol/L
- 24-hour proteinuria > 1g
- humoral rejection
- vasculitis
Contacts and Locations
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | University Hospital, Rouen |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00213590 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 1998/081/HP |
| Study First Received: | September 13, 2005 |
| Last Updated: | February 14, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | France: Afssaps - Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des produits de santé (Saint-Denis) |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Renal Insufficiency Kidney Diseases Urologic Diseases Cyclosporins Cyclosporine Immunosuppressive Agents Mycophenolate mofetil Enzyme Inhibitors Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action |
Pharmacologic Actions Immunologic Factors Physiological Effects of Drugs Antifungal Agents Anti-Infective Agents Therapeutic Uses Dermatologic Agents Antirheumatic Agents |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 21, 2013