Dexamethasone-Eluting Stent in Acute Coronary Syndrome to Prevent Restenosis
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The major obstacle of the long- termed success of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the restenosis. Restenosis results from complex pathophysiological response of the vascular tissue to the balloon injury. In the pre-stent era, 80% of it was attributed to vascular recoil. However, by way of the mechanical support of metallic stent, recoil is no more the major reason of restenosis. About 80 % of In-stent restenosis resulted from intimal hyperplasia.
The mechanism of the Intra-stent restenosis included 4 stages. First stage comprised the first 3 days after balloon injury, when the inflammatory reaction is most severe throughout the course. At that time, anti-inflammatory drug as steroid wuold be helpful to prevent the course of restenosis. Until the end of the third week, smooth muscle cells migrate and then proliferate in the second and the third stage, and the key effort to prevent restenosis right now is inhibition of cell cycle. Intravascular radiotherapy (so called Brachytherapy) and stent-based drug elution target upon them. Among them, rapamycin and paclitaxel proved to be effective both in animal and human experience. The last stage is re-epithelization, estrogen could promote the process and was considered to be effective in this stage.
Stent-based elution of corticosteroid, despite of its feasibility and safety, was not as effective as other anti-proliferation agent ( eg. Rapamycin etc). The major reason might be the patient group with coronary artery disease is a heterogenous one.
We believe if we applied corticosteroid over the patient with elevated inflammatory parameters, i.e. acute coronary syndrome (ACS) the effect of anti-restenosis would be obvious.
In this study, by a special-designed, phosphorylcholine-coated stent, dexamethasone could be readily absorbed and then gradually released locally even 4 weeks after deployment.
We expected a reduction of In-stent restenosis in ACS patient by the method with no or few systemic adverse effect of steroid; and angiographic follow-up as well as intra-vascular ultrasound assessment would be performed according to pur protocol.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Vessel Restenosis |
Device: Dexamethasone-Eluting Stent |
Phase 4 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Prevention |
| Estimated Enrollment: | 40 |
| Study Start Date: | January 2003 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | December 2003 |
The major obstacle of the long- termed success of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the restenosis. Restenosis results from complex pathopysiological response of the vascular tissue to the balloon injury. In the pre-stent era, 80% of it was attributed to vascular recoil. However, by way of the mechanical support of metallic stent, recoil is no more the major reason of restenosis. About 80 % of In-stent restenosis resulted from intimal hyperplasia.
The mechanism of the Intra-stent restenosis included 4 stages. First stage comprised the first 3 days after balloon injury, when the inflammatory reaction is most severe throughout the course. At that time, anti-inflammatory drug as steroid would be helpful to prevent the course of restenosis. Until the end of the third week, smooth muscle cells migrate and then proliferate in the second and the third stage, and the key effort to prevent restenosis right now is inhibition of cell cycle. Intravascular radiotherapy (so called Brachytherapy) and stent-based drug elution target upon them. Among them, rapamycin and paclitaxel proved to be effective both in animal and human experience. The last stage is re-epithelization, estrogen could promote the process and was considered to be effective in this stage.
Stent-based elution of corticosteroid, despite of its feasibility and safety, was not as effective as other anti-proliferation agent ( eg. Rapamycin etc). The major reason might be the patient group with coronary artery disease is a heterogenous one.
We believe if we applied corticosteroid over the patient with elevated inflammatory parameters, i.e. acute coronary syndrome (ACS) the effect of anti-restenosis would be obvious.
In this study, by a special-designed, phosphorylcholine-coated stent, dexamethasone could be readily absorbed and then gradually released locally even 4 weeks after deployment.
We expected a reduction of In-stent restenosis in ACS patient by the method with no or few systemic adverse effect of steroid; and angiographic follow-up as well as intra-vascular ultrasound assessment would be performed according to pur protocol.
Eligibility| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- ACS patient
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Contacts and Locations
More Information
No publications provided
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00190099 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | FEMH-93005 |
| Study First Received: | September 11, 2005 |
| Last Updated: | November 17, 2005 |
| Health Authority: | Taiwan: Department of Health |
Keywords provided by Far Eastern Memorial Hospital:
|
In-stent restenosis, Drug eluting stent, dexamethasone, Acute coronary syndrome |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Acute Coronary Syndrome Myocardial Ischemia Heart Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases Angina Pectoris Vascular Diseases Chest Pain Pain Signs and Symptoms Dexamethasone acetate Dexamethasone Dexamethasone 21-phosphate BB 1101 Anti-Inflammatory Agents Therapeutic Uses |
Pharmacologic Actions Antiemetics Autonomic Agents Peripheral Nervous System Agents Physiological Effects of Drugs Central Nervous System Agents Gastrointestinal Agents Glucocorticoids Hormones Hormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone Antagonists Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal Antineoplastic Agents Protease Inhibitors Enzyme Inhibitors Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 17, 2013