Xray Volume Imaging (Cone Beam CT) - Prostate Cancer
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Conformal dose escalated radiotherapy was adopted as the standard treatment technique at PMH for intermediate risk patients with localised disease in 1997. This technique provides a much smaller margin of error for treatment set-up and delivery than with conventional techniques. One way to ensure the accuracy of treatment delivery is to image the prostate position daily, prior to therapy, to allow for appropriate set-up corrections. To do so, imaging markers are implanted into the prostate under guided ultrasound (a standard procedure at PMH). However, there are disadvantages in using imaging markers which include added time to the treatment planning process, and an invasive procedure with a potential for discomfort, bleeding and infection. This study will investigate and compare X-ray volume imaging to the gold standard imaging markers.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Prostatic Neoplasms |
Procedure: daily Xray volume imaging for planning radiotherapy |
Phase 2 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Non-Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Clinical Study of X-Ray Volume Imaging to Evaluate the Daily Set-Up Accuracy of Conformal Prostate Radiotherapy |
- To evaluate he feasibility of daily X-ray volume imaging during conformal radiotherapy.
- To provide preliminary data concerning the relative utility of daily X-ray volume image matching compared to fiducial marker image matching.
| Estimated Enrollment: | 30 |
| Study Start Date: | November 2003 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | November 2004 |
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Male |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the prostate
- Patient undergoing escalated dose conformal external beam radiotherapy.
- Patient has low or intermediate risk prognostic factors: all of PSA <21, Gleason score <8, clinical T category <T3, clinical N category 0 or X, M category 0 or X.
- Informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- No diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the prostate
- Patient not undergoing escalated dose conformal radiotherapy
- Patient does not have low or intermediate risk prognostic factors
Contacts and Locations| Canada, Ontario | |
| Princess Margaret Hospital | |
| Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2M9 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Charles Catton, MD | Princess Margaret Hospital, Canada |
More Information
No publications provided
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00188799 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | UHN REB 03-0483-CE, Abbott-CARO Uro-OncologicAward |
| Study First Received: | September 12, 2005 |
| Last Updated: | September 12, 2005 |
| Health Authority: | Canada: Ethics Review Committee |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Neoplasms Prostatic Neoplasms Genital Neoplasms, Male Urogenital Neoplasms |
Neoplasms by Site Genital Diseases, Male Prostatic Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 16, 2013