Does Intensive Task Specific Training Improve Balance After Acute Stroke?
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The aim of this study is to investigate whether additional task specific physiotherapy treatment and a self administrated home training program results in better balance compared to traditional follow up care.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Cerebrovascular Accident |
Behavioral: Physical therapy technique and exercises |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Subject) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Intensive Task Specific Training With Traditional Follow up Care After Discharge From a Stroke Unit. |
- The Berg Balance Scale [ Time Frame: Inclusion, four weeks follow-up, twelve weeks follow-up and six months follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Mini Mental State Examination [ Time Frame: Inclusion ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Scandinavian Stroke Scale [ Time Frame: Inclusion ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Motor Assessment Scale [ Time Frame: Inclusion, four weeks follow-up, twelve weeks follow-up, six months follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Timed Up and Go [ Time Frame: Inclusion, four weeks follow-up, twelve weeks follow-up, six months follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Step Test [ Time Frame: Inclusion, four weeks follow-up, twelve weeks follow-up, six months follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Walking speed [ Time Frame: Inclusion, four weeks follow-up, twelve weeks follow-up, six months follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Barthel Index [ Time Frame: Inclusion, four weeks follow-up, twelve weeks follow-up, six months follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Modified Rankin Scale [ Time Frame: Inclusion, four weeks follow-up, twelve weeks follow-up, six months follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Fall Efficacy Scale [ Time Frame: Inclusion, four weeks follow-up, twelve weeks follow-up, six months follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Stroke Impact Scale [ Time Frame: Inclusion, four weeks follow-up, twelve weeks follow-up, six months follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Enrollment: | 62 |
| Study Start Date: | April 2004 |
| Study Completion Date: | April 2008 |
| Primary Completion Date: | April 2008 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: A
Intensive task specific balance training
|
Behavioral: Physical therapy technique and exercises
The experimental group receives task specific physical therapy three times a week for the first four weeks after discharge from hospital and one session pr week for the next eight weeks in addition to ordinary physical therapy The active comparator group receives only ordinary physical therapy during this period.
|
|
Active Comparator: B
Traditional physical therapy
|
Behavioral: Physical therapy technique and exercises
The experimental group receives task specific physical therapy three times a week for the first four weeks after discharge from hospital and one session pr week for the next eight weeks in addition to ordinary physical therapy The active comparator group receives only ordinary physical therapy during this period.
|
Detailed Description:
Increased risk of falling is a major problem after stroke and impaired balance is one of the main reasons for falling. Early and intensive physiotherapy seems to be beneficial for functional outcome after stroke although it is still unknown whether one specific physiotherapy technique is better than another.
Comparison: Traditional follow up care by the community health care system with additional task specific physiotherapy three times a week and a daily self administrated home training program compared to traditional follow up care by the community health care system.
Eligibility| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Admitted to the stroke unit with a diagnosis of stroke
- Living in the city of Trondheim
- Included 4 - 14 days after first sign of symptoms
- Modified Rankin Scale > 3 before admission to hospital
- Scandinavian Stroke Scale (SSS) less than 58 points and more than 14 points
- SSS leg item less than 6 points or SSS movement item less than 12 points
- Discharged to home or a rehabilitation clinic
- Mini Mental State Examination Score more than 20 points
- Able and willing to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Seriously heart- and lung-diseases
- Other diseases which makes it difficult to evaluate the function
- Already included in the trial
Contacts and Locations| Norway | |
| Norwegian University of Science and Technology | |
| Trondheim, Norway, 7004 | |
| Study Chair: | Bent Indredavik, assoc-prof | Department of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian university of Science and Technology |
More Information
Publications:
| Responsible Party: | Norwegian University of Science and Technology |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00184431 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | SU01-ISM-NTNU |
| Study First Received: | September 15, 2005 |
| Last Updated: | October 17, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | Norway: Norwegian Social Science Data Services |
Keywords provided by Norwegian University of Science and Technology:
|
Cerebrovascular Accident Physical Therapy Techniques Musculoskeletal Equilibrium Rehabilitation |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Cerebral Infarction Stroke Brain Infarction Brain Ischemia Cerebrovascular Disorders |
Brain Diseases Central Nervous System Diseases Nervous System Diseases Vascular Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 17, 2013