Risperidone and Divalproex Sodium With MRI Assessment in Pediatric Bipolar
Recruitment status was Recruiting
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
There are two purposes for this project. Study 1 is to determine whether risperidone is better than divalproex sodium in treating/stabilizing pediatric bipolar disorder. Study 2 is to look at the dysfunction in brain activity before treatment, and to look for any alteration after treatment with either risperidone or divalproex sodium. One initial part of Study 2 is looking at 10 healthy control adults to learn what areas of the brain are activated when the subject is exposed to faces showing different emotions, and when the subject is asked to determine emotionality, age, and recall of faces.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Bipolar Disorder |
Drug: Divalproex Sodium Drug: risperidone |
Phase 2 Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Masking: Double-Blind Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Controlled Trial of Risperidone and Divalproex Sodium With MRI Assessment of Affected Circuitry in Pre and Post Treatment in Pediatric Bipolar |
- All subjects along with their parents will undergo
- semi-structured interviews, and assessments for side effects. The following rating scales will be administered: the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS),
- Bipolar Clinical Global Impression Scale (BP-CGI),
- Overt Aggression Scale (OAS) ,
- Child Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R),
- Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale in Children (BPRS-C),
- Child Bipolar Rating Scale- Parent version (subscales: Child Mania Rating Scale,
- Child Bipolar Depression Rating Scale,
- Child Bipolar Cycling Rating Scale) and
- Teacher version (subscales: Child Mania Rating Scale, Child Bipolar Depression Rating Scale)(CBRS-P/T),
- Abnormal Involuntary Movements Scale (AIMS),
- Adverse Events Rating Scale for Bipolar Disorder (AERS-BP) at the initial Screen, and every week for 6 weeks after starting the medication treatment.
- Teachers will be asked to complete the Child Bipolar Rating Scale every week for 6 weeks
| Estimated Enrollment: | 210 |
| Study Start Date: | April 2003 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | January 2008 |
Pediatric Bipolar Disorder (PBD) severely impairs a child’s emotional development, and is associated with alarming rates of suicide, school failure, aggression, risk taking behaviors and substance abuse (Geller et al, 1998; 2001; Carlson et al, 1998). At present, very little is known about the pathophysiology or optimal treatment of PBD. The long range goals of this proposal are threefold: to investigate a range of pharmacotherapeutic agents that are safe and efficacious for PBD, to use fMRI techniques to examine abnormalities in brain function in this disorder, as well as any change in brain function after treatment.
In contrast to the adult literature, we are aware of only two prospective studies assessing the efficacy of standard mood stabilizers in a pediatric sample. In one, lithium was found to be moderately effective in PBD with comorbid substance abuse (Geller et al, 1998). In the other, divalproex sodium, lithium and carbamazepine produced a maximum of 50% symptom reduction (Kowatch et al, 2000). Subsequently, Kafantaris et al (2001) observed a potentiation of lithium's antimanic effect when combined with risperidone. Further, a prospective, open trial of olanzapine for PBD reported a 70% symptom reduction (Frazier et al, 2001) with a retention rate of 96% compared to only 7% with classic mood stabilizers (Kowatch et al, 2000).
Thus, parallelling adult studies (Sachs et al, 2000), novel antipsychotics are a promising treatment in this population. Further, up to 60% of acute PBD episodes present with psychotic features (Geller et al, in press). Finally, the time to full effect with mood stabilizers is often 4 weeks in children (Kowatch et al, 2000; Geller et al, 1998; Kafantaris et al, 2001), whereas antipsychotics usually have a more rapid response onset (Pavuluri et al, in press). Given the potential efficacy of novel antipsychotics for PBD, the aim is to conduct a randomized trial comparing a novel antipsychotic to a standard mood stabilizer:
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 10 Years to 20 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Children with Bipolar Disorder
- Must be able to swallow tablets
Exclusion Criteria:
- Children with general medical condition such as head injury, epilepsy, endocrine disorders
- Those who are on mood altering medications such as steroids, and those diagnosed with mental retardation are excluded to avoid confounding and contributing factors to mood swings.
- If we discover during the interview that the parent and/or child does not understand the consent/assent procedures, we will exclude them.
We expect only a small number of children to be excluded from the study due to exclusionary criteria. Selection of the subjects is not based on sex, race, or ethnic group.
For the fMRI study:
- Given the limited size of the magnet bore, individuals with a body weight over two-hundred and fifty pounds will be unable to be tested within the MRI scanner.
- Women in the latter stages of pregnancy may be excluded due to large body size and potential discomfort while in the MRI apparatus.
- Standard contraindications for fMRI studies include: cardiac pacemaker, aneurysm clip, cochlear implants, shrapnel, history of metal fragments in eyes, claustrophobia
- Participants with an IQ of less than 70 (assessed by WRAT) are likely to be excluded due to difficulties comprehending tasks and procedures.
Healthy Individuals/Controls:
- Healthy participants will have full scale above 70
- A negative family history of psychiatric treatment or diagnosis is necessary for healthy comparison participants
- Individuals with a positive medical history of neurological disease, brain injury, and/or psychotic, mood, or substance abuse disorders will not be admitted
Contacts and Locations| Contact: Melissa S Moss, BA | 312-355-1911 | mmoss@psych.uic.edu |
| Contact: Erin M Harral, BA | 312-413-1710 | eharral@psych.uic.edu |
| United States, Illinois | |
| NPI | Recruiting |
| Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612 | |
| Contact: Mani Pavuluri, MD 312-413-1722 mpavuluri@psych.uic.edu | |
| Principal Investigator: Mani Pavuluri, MD | |
| Principal Investigator: | Mani Pavuluri, MD | University of Ilinois at Chicago |
More Information
No publications provided
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00176202 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | RIS-BIP-407 |
| Study First Received: | September 9, 2005 |
| Last Updated: | April 18, 2007 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Anticonvulsants Bipolar Disorder Affective Disorders, Psychotic Mood Disorders Mental Disorders Valproic Acid Risperidone Central Nervous System Agents Therapeutic Uses Pharmacologic Actions Enzyme Inhibitors Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action |
GABA Agents Neurotransmitter Agents Physiological Effects of Drugs Antimanic Agents Tranquilizing Agents Central Nervous System Depressants Psychotropic Drugs Serotonin Antagonists Serotonin Agents Antipsychotic Agents Dopamine Antagonists Dopamine Agents |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 19, 2013