Safety and Efficacy of Nitrogen Mustard in Treatment of Mycosis Fungoides
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
This study will evaluate the efficacy, tolerability and safety of the topical application of mechlorethamine (MCH) formulations in patients with stage I or IIA mycosis fungoides (MF).
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Mycosis Fungoides |
Drug: mechlorethamine-MCH (nitrogen mustard) |
Phase 2 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Phase II Pivotal Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Nitrogen Mustard (NM) 0.02% Ointment Formulations in Patients With Stage I or IIA Mycosis Fungoides (MF) |
- Ratio of Response Rates Based on CAILS [ Time Frame: Assessment made at Day 1 and every subsequent visit during treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The ratio of the response rate of the patients treated with the PG formulation to the response rate of the patients treated with the AP formulation. Skin response determined by at least a 50% reduction from baseline in the Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Severity (CAILS) following up to 12 months of treatment
- Severity-weighted Assessment Tool (SWAT) Within up to 12 Months by 2 or More Consecutive Observations Over at Least 4 Weeks [ Time Frame: Assessment made at Day 1 and every subsequent visit during treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Percent of Participants Achieving at Least 50% Improvement of Severity Weighted Assessment Tool (SWAT) [ Time Frame: Baseline to end of therapy ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Assessment of lesion distribution and severity. A responder analysis was performed on whether subject achieved at least 50% improvement on scale. This had to be confirmed on at least one visit at least 4 weeks apart.
| Enrollment: | 260 |
| Study Start Date: | May 2006 |
| Study Completion Date: | August 2011 |
| Primary Completion Date: | August 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: 1 (PG - NM (MCH) 0.02%)
PG - mechlorethamine-MCH (nitrogen mustard) 0.02% gel To evaluate the tolerability and safety of topical mechlorethamine-MCH (nitrogen mustard) 0.02% ointment formulations in patients with stage I or IIA MF
|
Drug: mechlorethamine-MCH (nitrogen mustard)
All affected areas (lesions) are to be treated once daily for twelve months with mechlorethamine-MCH (nitrogen mustard) 0.02% PG or NM 0.02% AP ointment
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: 2 (AP - MCH(NM) 0.02%)
AP - mechlorethamine-MCH (nitrogen mustard) 0.02% compounded in Aquaphor To evaluate the tolerability and safety of mechlorethamine-MCH (nitrogen mustard)0.02% ointment formulations in patients with stage I or IIA MF
|
Drug: mechlorethamine-MCH (nitrogen mustard)
All affected areas (lesions) are to be treated once daily for twelve months with mechlorethamine-MCH (nitrogen mustard) 0.02% PG or NM 0.02% AP ointment
Other Names:
|
Detailed Description:
The successful use of mechlorethamine (MCH) as a topical agent in the treatment of mycosis fungoides, a form of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, was first reported in the late 1950s, and provided a rationale for skin-directed chemotherapy that minimized systemic toxicity. Since then, multiple investigators have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of topically applied MCH in the treatment of mycosis fungoides. This study will evaluate the efficacy (non-inferiority), tolerability and safety of topical application of MCH proprietary gel versus a compounded ointment formulation in Aquaphor in patients with stage I or IIA MF.
Eligibility| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with mycosis fungoides confirmed by a skin biopsy
- Stage I or IIA patients must have been treated previously with prior topical therapies including PUVA, UVB, topical steroids, but not NM within the past 2 years, or topical carmustine (BCNU)
- Patients must be otherwise healthy with acceptable organ function.
- Prior to initiating study therapy, patients must not have had topical therapy within four weeks
- Lab values within normal range
- Willing/able to give consent
- Must use effective means of contraception if of childbearing potential
Exclusion Criteria:
- Newly diagnosed mycosis fungoides with no prior therapy
- A prior history of treatment with topical NM within the past 2 years or topical carmustine (BCNU)
- Use of topical or systemic therapies for MF within four (4) weeks of entry in the study
- Patients with a diagnosis of stage IIB-IV MF
- Serious known concurrent medical illness or infection, which could potentially present a safety risk and/or prevent compliance with the requirements of the treatment program
- Pregnant or nursing females, or males and females of childbearing potential, not using an effective means of contraception
- Patients who have had radiation therapy within one year of study start
- Patients who have a history of a higher T score than T2 or a higher N score than N1
- Patients who do not agree to do all labs at one site
Contacts and Locations| United States, California | |
| Stanford University Medical Center | |
| Stanford, California, United States, 94305 | |
| United States, Illinois | |
| Northwestern University - Dept. of Dermatology | |
| Chicago, Illinois, United States, 61611 | |
| United States, New York | |
| NYU Medical Center Dept. of Dermatology | |
| New York, New York, United States, 10016 | |
| Columbia University, Dept. of Dermatology | |
| New York, New York, United States, 10032 | |
| United States, North Carolina | |
| Duke University Medical Center | |
| Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710 | |
| United States, Oklahoma | |
| Oklahoma University | |
| Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States, 74104 | |
| United States, Pennsylvania | |
| University of Pennsylvania | |
| Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104 | |
| Fox Chase Cancer Center | |
| Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19111-2497 | |
| United States, Texas | |
| University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center | |
| Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390 | |
| The University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center | |
| Houston, Texas, United States, 77030 | |
| United States, Utah | |
| Utah Clinical Trials, LLC | |
| Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84107 | |
| United States, Wisconsin | |
| University of Wisconsin | |
| Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53791 | |
| Study Director: | Stuart Lessin, M.D. | Fox Chase Cancer Center |
More Information
Publications:
Additional publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
| Responsible Party: | Yaupon Therapeutics |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00168064 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 2005NMMF-201-US |
| Study First Received: | September 7, 2005 |
| Results First Received: | July 12, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | October 2, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Keywords provided by Yaupon Therapeutics:
|
Mycosis Fungoides Nitrogen Mustard Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma CTCL - Mycosis Fungoides |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Mycoses Mycosis Fungoides Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous Lymphoma, T-Cell Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Neoplasms by Histologic Type Neoplasms Lymphoproliferative Disorders Lymphatic Diseases |
Immunoproliferative Disorders Immune System Diseases Mechlorethamine Nitrogen Mustard Compounds Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating Alkylating Agents Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Pharmacologic Actions Antineoplastic Agents Therapeutic Uses |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 18, 2013