Combined Spinal-Epidural Versus Traditional Labor Epidural
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of this study to compare the use of spinal-epidural versus traditional labor epidural on maternal and fetal effects. The hope is to determine the safest and most effective epidural method of relieving pain during labor.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Labour Pain |
Drug: Bupivacaine and Fentanyl (for CSE) Drug: Bupivacaine and Fentanyl (for traditional epidural) |
Phase 4 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Subject) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Combined Spinal-Epidural Versus Traditional Labor Epidural: A Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Maternal and Fetal Effects |
- Adverse fetal effects: fetal bradycardia and abnormal fetal heart rate patterns [ Time Frame: during the 60 minutes after placement of analgesia ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Average change in systolic blood pressure [ Time Frame: during the 60 minutes after placement of analgesia ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Average change in mean blood pressure [ Time Frame: during the 60 minutes after placement of analgesia ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Blood pressure differences between the upper and lower extremities [ Time Frame: during the 60 minutes after placement of analgesia ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Efficacy of analgesia as rated by the visual analog pain scale [ Time Frame: during the 60 minutes after analgesic placement ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Pruritus [ Time Frame: through the first day following placement of analgesia ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Incidence of hypotension [ Time Frame: during the 60 minutes after placement of analgesia ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Patient satisfaction [ Time Frame: first day following placement of analgesia ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Enrollment: | 127 |
| Study Start Date: | October 2003 |
| Study Completion Date: | September 2006 |
| Primary Completion Date: | September 2006 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: CSE
Subjects assigned to this group will receive "combined spinal-epidural" (CSE) to relieve pain during labor. For CSE, subjects receive a small amount of a local anesthetic and a small amount of a narcotic pain killer directly into the spinal canal (a smaller amount than is given for traditional epidural), followed by a small amount of both of these medications that is continuously infused into the epidural space through a catheter that is left in place. CSE is not experimental.
|
Drug: Bupivacaine and Fentanyl (for CSE)
Bupivacaine 0.25% x 1 cc + Fentanyl 20 mcg, followed by infusion of Bupivacaine 0.0625% with Fentanyl 2 mcg/mL at 12 cc/hr
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Traditional Epidural
Subjects assigned to this group will receive "traditional epidural" to relieve pain during labor. For the traditional epidural, subjects receive a small amount of a local anesthetic and a small amount of a narcotic pain killer into the epidural space, followed by a small amount of both of these medications that is continuously infused into the epidural space through a catheter that is left in place. The traditional epidural is not experimental.
|
Drug: Bupivacaine and Fentanyl (for traditional epidural)
Bupivacaine 0.0625% with Fentanyl 2 mcg/mL x 15 cc, followed by infusion of Bupivacaine 0.0625% with Fentanyl 2 mcg/mL at 12 cc/hr
Other Names:
|
Detailed Description:
Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSE) was developed to allow excellent pain control for the pregnant woman who arrives in advanced labor and does not have much time for the anesthetic to have its effect. This has been extended recently to women in all stages of labor because of its rapid and excellent control of pain. Recent case series comparing CSE with traditional epidural have shown a slight difference in the rate of hypotension and fetal bradycardia, with the CSE technique having a higher rate of both of these side effects. This study will compare the two techniques in a prospective, randomized method.
The aim is to compare the maternal and fetal effects of two neuraxial block techniques for pain control during labor, to document blood pressure changes in upper and lower extremities pre- and post- block placement, and to document side effects (e.g. pruritus) and patient satisfaction with both techniques.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 50 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Female |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient is able to read, understand and voluntarily sign the approved informed consent form (ICF) prior to any study- specific procedure;
- Must be between 18 to 50 years of age.
- Must be carrying a singleton fetus at term.
- Must have less than a body mass index of 40.
- Must be in labor, or is having a medical induction of labor.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient who has chronic renal disease, pre-existing hypertension, or pre-eclampsia.
- Patient who is undergoing an elective cesarean delivery
- Patient who has a presence of non-reassuring fetal status
- Patient who has an abnormal or non-reassuring fetal heart rate (FHR) pattern
Contacts and Locations| United States, New York | |
| New York-Presbyterian Hospital; Weill Medical College of Cornell | |
| New York, New York, United States, 10065 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Daniel W. Skupski, M.D. | Obstetrics & Gynecology; Weill Medical College of Cornell - New York Presbyterian Hospital |
| Principal Investigator: | Klaus Kjaer-Pedersen, M.D. | Anesthesiology; Weill Medical College of Cornell - New York Presbyterian Hospital |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Daniel W. Skupski, M.D., Weill Medical College of Cornell University |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00151346 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 0306006204 (0603-889) |
| Study First Received: | September 6, 2005 |
| Last Updated: | March 17, 2008 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Keywords provided by Weill Medical College of Cornell University:
|
Epidural Labour pain Pregnant women Epidural anesthesia |
Labour, Obstetric labor pain labor, obstetric labor analgesia |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Labor Pain Pain Neurologic Manifestations Nervous System Diseases Signs and Symptoms Bupivacaine Fentanyl Anesthetics, Local Anesthetics Central Nervous System Depressants Physiological Effects of Drugs |
Pharmacologic Actions Sensory System Agents Peripheral Nervous System Agents Central Nervous System Agents Therapeutic Uses Adjuvants, Anesthesia Narcotics Analgesics Anesthetics, Intravenous Anesthetics, General Analgesics, Opioid |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 22, 2013