Oral Versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Induction of Labor
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy between a single dose of oral misoprostol 100 microgram and vaginal misoprostol 50 microgram for induction of labor.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Termed Pregnancy With Indications for Labor Induction. |
Drug: Misoprostol |
Phase 2 Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double-Blind Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Single Dose of Oral Versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Induction of Labor: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
- The time interval from induction to vaginal delivery and vaginal delivery rate within 24 hours.
- Rate of vaginal delivery within 24 hours.
- Cesarean section rate.
- Uterine tachysystole.
- Uterine hyperstimulation syndrome.
- Number of women received oxytocin.
- Neonatal outcomes.
| Estimated Enrollment: | 180 |
| Study Start Date: | March 2000 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | October 2001 |
Induction of labor is widely carried out all over the world in cases where continuation of pregnancy is hazardous to both the mother and/or fetus. The induction in a ripe cervix is not difficult but complications are significantly increased when the cervix is unripe. The only agent approved for cervical ripening and induction of labor in patients with an unripe cervix is dinoprostone(PGE2). Misoprostol is a synthetic PGE1 analogue marketed for the prevention and treatment of gastro-duodenal ulcers. Misoprostol costs much less than dinoprostone and does not require refrigeration and has few systemic side effects.In addition, it is rapidly absorbed orally and vaginally. Although misoprostol is not registered for such use, it has been widely used for obstetric indications such as induction of abortion and of labor. Misoprostol for induction of labor in preceding literatures mainly prescribed in multiple dosing regimen. The adverse effects on uterus potentially occur owing to the frequent administration of misoprostol. The objective of this study was to compare a single dose oral misoprostol with vaginal misoprostol.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 48 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Female |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
- A live singleton pregnancy at a gestation of >37 weeks, with obstetric or medical indications for induction, and unfavorable cervix (the initial Bishop score of <717), vertex presentation, reactive fetal heart rate pattern, absence of labor, and intact membranes without previous stripping. Post-term inductions were considered when gestational age was >41 weeks.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Suspected cephalo–pelvic disproportion, estimated fetal weight of >4000 grams, maternal age of <18 years, parity of >5, previous cesarean delivery or history of uterine incision, any contraindication for vaginal delivery or prostaglandins administration and suspected chorioamnionitis.
Contacts and Locations| Thailand | |
| BMA Medical College and Vajira Hospital | |
| Bangkok, Thailand, 10300 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Manit Sripramote, MD | BMA Medical College and Vajira Hospital |
More Information
No publications provided
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00148473 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | VJR-01 |
| Study First Received: | September 6, 2005 |
| Last Updated: | September 6, 2005 |
| Health Authority: | Thailand: Food and Drug Administration |
Keywords provided by Bangkok Metropolitan Administration Medical College and Vajira Hospital:
|
Cervical ripening. Induction of labor. Misoprostol. |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Misoprostol Anti-Ulcer Agents Gastrointestinal Agents Therapeutic Uses Pharmacologic Actions |
Oxytocics Reproductive Control Agents Physiological Effects of Drugs Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal Abortifacient Agents |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 18, 2013