Treatment for Subjects With Unresectable Stage III or Stage IV Melanoma
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Bayer
Collaborator:
Onyx Pharmaceuticals
Information provided by:
Bayer
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00110994
First received: May 16, 2005
Last updated: May 29, 2012
Last verified: May 2012
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
This is a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, multicenter, phase II study to compare the anti-tumor activity as measured by progression-free survival (PFS) and the tolerability of Sorafenib in combination with Dacarbazine (DTIC) versus DTIC in combination with placebo in subjects with unresectable Stage III or Stage IV melanoma who have not received prior cytotoxic chemotherapy. A total of approximately 98 subjects will be randomized to receive DTIC + Sorafenib or DTIC + Placebo.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Cancer Melanoma |
Drug: Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) Drug: Placebo Drug: Dacarbazine |
Phase 2 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Phase II Randomized, Placebo Controlled Study of Sorafenib in Repeated Cycles of 21 Days in Combination With Dacarbazine (DTIC) Chemotherapy in Subjects With Unresectable Stage III or Stage IV Melanoma |
Resource links provided by NLM:
Further study details as provided by Bayer:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- Progression Free Survival (PFS) [ Time Frame: Time from randomization to documented tumor progression or death (the maximum treatment duration of 71.1 weeks) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]PFS was calculated as the time (days) from date of randomization to date of first observed DP (per modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors [RECIST] or clinical judgment, whichever was earlier: CR, PR, stable disease, progressive disease) or death due to any cause, if death occurred before progression was documented. The actual date of tumor assessments was used for this calculation. PFS for subjects without progression or death was censored at the last date of tumor evaluation. PFS for subjects who had no tumor assessments after baseline and did not die was censored at 1 day.
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- Overall Survival (OS) [ Time Frame: Time from randomization to death (the maximum treatment duration of 71.1 weeks) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Overall Survival (OS) was calculated as the number of days from date of randomization to death date. Subjects who had not died at the time of analysis were censored at their last contact date.
- Number of Participants in Tumor Response Categories [ Time Frame: Every 6 weeks from the start of the treatment until the end of treatment visit with a median of 134 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Tumor response was defined as the best response (confirmed complete response [CR], partial response [PR], stable disease [SD], or progressive disease [PD]) assessed using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter [SLD] of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SLD. CR: Disappearance of all target lesions. SD: Does not qualify for CR or PR. PD: at least a 20% increase in SLD taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions.
- Time to Progression (TTP) [ Time Frame: Time from randomization to documented tumor progression (median time of 148 days) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]TTP was calculated as the time (days) from date of randomization to date of first observed disease progression (per modified RECIST or clinical judgment, whichever was earlier: CR, PR, stable disease, progressive disease). The actual dates of tumor assessments were used for this calculation. TTP for subjects without disease progression at the time of analysis, including subjects with death prior to progression, was censored at the last date of tumor evaluation. TTP for subjects who had no tumor assessments after baseline was censored at 1 day.
- Duration of Response (DOR) [ Time Frame: Time from initial response to documented tumor progression or death (median time of 188 days) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Duration of response was defined as the time from the first documented objective response of Partial Response (PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter [SLD] of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SLD or better) or Complete Response (CR: Disappearance of all target lesions), whichever was noted earlier, to disease progression or death (if death occurred before progression was documented). Duration of response for subjects who had not progressed or died at the time of analysis was censored at the date of their last tumor assessment.
- Change in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status From Baseline to the Visit When the Best Tumor Response Was Noted [ Time Frame: Baseline and every 6 weeks from the start of the treatment until the end of treatment visit with a median of 134 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Change in ECOG PS is defined as an improvement (increase) or worsening (decrease) of at least one grade from the baseline ECOG score (from 0 [fully active] to 5 [dead]). Change in ECOG PS was recorded at the visit at which best confirmed response (BCR) using the modified RECIST (PR, CR, stable disease or Progressive Disease (PD)) was first noted (the change was 7% for both Sorafenib and Placebo). The BCR is the BCR recorded from the start of the treatment until DP/recurrence (taking as reference for DP, the smallest measurements recorded since treatment started).
- Change of European Quality of Life 5-dimensional (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Index Score From Baseline to the Visit at Which Best Response Was First Noted [ Time Frame: Baseline and every 6 weeks from the start of the treatment until the end of treatment visit with a median of 134 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]European Quality of Life 5-dimensional (EQ-5D) is a self-administered questionnaire developed to measure health status across 5 dimensions: Mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels of response: No problem (1), some problems (2), and extreme problems (3). The five dimensions are summarized into a single score, the EQ‑5D index score, which ranges between 0 and 1, with 0 representing the worst imaginable health state or death and 1 representing perfect health.
- Change of European Quality of Life 5-dimensional (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Index Score From Baseline to the End of Treatment [ Time Frame: Baseline and every 6 weeks from the start of the treatment until the end of treatment visit with a median of 134 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]European Quality of Life 5-dimensional (EQ-5D) is a self-administered questionnaire developed to measure health status across 5 dimensions: Mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels of response: No problem (1), some problems (2), and extreme problems (3). The five dimensions are summarized into a single score, the EQ‑5D index score, which ranges between 0 and 1, with 0 representing the worst imaginable health state or death and 1 representing perfect health.
- Change of European Quality of Life Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) Score From Baseline to the Visit at Which Best Response Was First Noted [ Time Frame: Baseline and every 6 weeks from the start of the treatment until the end of treatment visit with a median of 134 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]European Quality of Life Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) is a self-administered test that records the respondents' self-rated health status on a visual analogue scale ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). Responders specify their scales by indicating a position along a continuous line between 0 and 100.
- Change of European Quality of Life Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) Score From Baseline to the End of Treatment [ Time Frame: Baseline and every 6 weeks from the start of the treatment until the end of treatment visit with a median of 134 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]European Quality of Life Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) is a self-administered test that records the respondents' self-rated health status on a visual analogue scale ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). Responders specify their scales by indicating a position along a continuous line between 0 and 100.
| Enrollment: | 101 |
| Study Start Date: | April 2005 |
| Study Completion Date: | March 2008 |
| Primary Completion Date: | October 2006 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Dacarbazine
Sorafenib, 2 tablets (200 mg each) orally twice daily (bid) on study days 1-21 + Dacarbazine, 1000 mg/m^2 intravenous on study day 1 (21 days per cycle) for double-blind (DB) treatment. Subjects who discontinued DB treatment with complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) entered active follow up period. Subjects who discontinued DB treatment with disease progression (DP) entered long term follow up period.
|
Drug: Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006)
Sorafenib, 400 mg, 2 tablets (200 mg each) po (per os) bid (twice daily) Study days 1-21
Drug: Dacarbazine
Dacarbazine, 1000 mg/m^2 intravenous on Study Day 1
|
|
Active Comparator: Placebo + Dacarbazine
Placebo, 2 tablets orally twice daily on study days 1-21 + Dacarbazine, 1000 mg/m^2 intravenous on study day 1 (21 days per cycle) for double-blind (DB) treatment. Subjects who discontinued DB treatment with complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) entered active follow up period. Subjects who discontinued DB treatment with disease progression (DP) entered long term follow up period.
|
Drug: Placebo
Placebo, 2 tablets, po (per os) bid (twice daily) Study days 1-21
Drug: Dacarbazine
Dacarbazine, 1000 mg/m^2 intravenous on Study Day 1
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients who have a life expectancy of at least 12 weeks
- Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed unresectable (Stage III) or metastatic (Stage IV) melanoma
- Patients who have an ECOG PS of 0, or 1
- Measurable disease defined as at least one lesion that can be accurately and serially measured per the modified RECIST criteria
Exclusion Criteria:
- Primary ocular or mucosal melanoma
- Previous or concurrent cancer that is distinct in primary site or histology from the cancer being evaluated in this study except cervical carcinoma in situ, treated basal cell carcinoma, superficial bladder tumors (Ta [Noninvasive papillary carcinoma], Tis [Carcinoma in situ: "flat tumor"] & T1 [Tumor invades subepithelial connective tissue]) or any cancer curatively treated < 3 years prior to study entry
- History of cardiac disease
- Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00110994
Locations
| United States, Arizona | |
| Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85724 | |
| United States, Colorado | |
| Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045 | |
| United States, Florida | |
| Lakeland, Florida, United States, 33805 | |
| United States, Illinois | |
| Park Ridge, Illinois, United States, 60068 | |
| United States, Massachusetts | |
| Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215 | |
| Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115-6084 | |
| Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114 | |
| United States, Missouri | |
| St. Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110-1093 | |
| United States, Nebraska | |
| Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68114 | |
| United States, North Carolina | |
| Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28203 | |
| United States, Pennsylvania | |
| Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15232 | |
| United States, South Carolina | |
| Hilton Head Island, South Carolina, United States, 29926-2739 | |
| United States, Tennessee | |
| Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232-6307 | |
| United States, Texas | |
| San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229 | |
Sponsors and Collaborators
Bayer
Onyx Pharmaceuticals
Investigators
| Study Director: | Bayer Study Director | Bayer |
More Information
Additional Information:
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Therapeutic Area Head, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00110994 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 11715 |
| Study First Received: | May 16, 2005 |
| Results First Received: | January 26, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | May 29, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Melanoma Neuroendocrine Tumors Neuroectodermal Tumors Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal Neoplasms by Histologic Type Neoplasms Neoplasms, Nerve Tissue Nevi and Melanomas Dacarbazine |
Sorafenib Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating Alkylating Agents Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Pharmacologic Actions Antineoplastic Agents Therapeutic Uses Protein Kinase Inhibitors Enzyme Inhibitors |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 22, 2013