Trial record 12 of 20 for:
"Osteogenesis imperfecta"
Safety and Efficacy of Risedronate in the Treatment of Osteogenesis Imperfecta in Children
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Warner Chilcott
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Warner Chilcott
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00106028
First received: March 18, 2005
Last updated: April 15, 2013
Last verified: April 2013
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Children with Osteogenesis Imperfecta (OI) have bone pain, low bone mass and fractures. There are no approved drugs for the treatment of OI in children, even though some intravenous (IV) bisphosphonates are used off-label in some countries. In a single dose, pharmacokinetic study, data showed that risedronate was well tolerated in 28 children with OI. This three year study will test the safety and efficacy of risedronate in the treatment of children with OI. For the first year, patients will be randomized to the risedronate and placebo groups in a 2:1 ratio. For the second and third years of the study, all patients will receive risedronate.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Osteogenesis Imperfecta |
Drug: risedronate sodium (Actonel) Drug: Placebo |
Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Safety and Efficacy of Risedronate in the Treatment of Osteogenesis Imperfecta in Children |
Resource links provided by NLM:
Further study details as provided by Warner Chilcott:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- Percent Change From Baseline Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Month 12, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)and read by central reader. Duplicate scans obtained at screening and Month 12.
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- Percent Change From Baseline Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Month 24, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)and read by central reader.
- Percent Change From Baseline Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Month 36, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)and read by central reader.
- Percent Change From Baseline in Total Body BMD at Month 12, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Percent Change from baseline in Total Body Bone Mineral Density (BMD) measured by DXA.
- Percent Change From Baseline in Total Body BMD at Month 24, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Percent Change from baseline in Total Body Bone Mineral Density (BMD) measured by DXA.
- Percent Change From Baseline in Total Body BMD at Month 36, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Percent Change from baseline in Total Body Bone Mineral Density (BMD) measured by DXA.
- Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMC (Bone Mineral Content) at Month 12, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMC (Bone Mineral Content) at Month 24, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMC (Bone Mineral Content) at Month 36, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Percent Change From Baseline in Total Body BMC at Month 12, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Percent Change From Baseline in Total Body BMC at Month 24, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Percent Change From Baseline in Total Body BMC at Month 36, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Lumbar Spine Z-score - Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Lumbar Spine Z-score - number of standard deviations a patient's BMD differs from the average BMD of their age, sex, and ethnicity. Positive scores indicate BMD above the mean; Positive values are "best values" and negative values are "worst values".
- Lumbar Spine Z-score - Percent Change From Baseline to Month 24, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Lumbar Spine Z-score - number of standard deviations a patient's BMD differs from the average BMD of their age, sex, and ethnicity. Positive scores indicate BMD above the mean; Positive values are "best values" and negative values are "worst values".
- Lumbar Spine Z-score - Percent Change From Baseline to Month 36, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Lumbar Spine Z-score - number of standard deviations a patient's BMD differs from the average BMD of their age, sex, and ethnicity. Positive scores indicate BMD above the mean; Positive values are "best values" and negative values are "worst values".
- Total Body Z-score- Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Total Body Z-score - number of standard deviations a patient's BMD differs from the average BMD of their age, sex, and ethnicity. Positive scores indicate BMD above the mean; Positive values are "best values" and negative values are "worst values".
- Total Body Z-score- Percent Change From Baseline to Month 24, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Total Body Z-score - number of standard deviations a patient's BMD differs from the average BMD of their age, sex, and ethnicity. Positive scores indicate BMD above the mean; Positive values are "best values" and negative values are "worst values".
- Total Body Z-score- Percent Change From Baseline to Month 36, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Total Body Z-score - number of standard deviations a patient's BMD differs from the average BMD of their age, sex, and ethnicity. Positive scores indicate BMD above the mean; Positive values are "best values" and negative values are "worst values".
- Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Area at Month 12, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Measured by DXA.
- Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Area at Month 24, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Measured by DXA.
- Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Area at Month 36, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Measured by DXA.
- Percent Change From Baseline in Total Body Bone Area Month 12, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Percent Change From Baseline in Total Body Bone Area Month 24, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Percent Change From Baseline in Total Body Bone Area Month 36, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- New Morphometric Vertebral Fracture at Month 12, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Morphometric Vertebral Fracture measured by semi-quantitative (SQ) analysis of x-rays using the Genant scoring system at endpoint. (Ref: Genant 1993). SQ-Scores range from 0 (no fracture) to 3 (severe fracture). New fracture = SQ score is 0 at baseline and >0 at the specified end visit.
- New Morphometric Vertebral Fracture at Month 36, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Morphometric Vertebral Fracture measured by SQ analysis of x-rays using the Genant scoring system. (Ref: Genant 1993). SQ-Scores range from 0 (no fracture) to 3 (severe fracture). New fracture = SQ score is 0 at baseline and >0 at the specified end visit.
- Categorization by Number of New Morphometric Vertebral Fracture at Month 12, ITT [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Patients with 1 or more New Morphometric Vertebral Fracture as measured by SQ analysis of x-rays using the Genant scoring system (Ref: Genant 1993). SQ-Scores range from 0 (no fracture) to 3 (severe fracture). Incidence = SQ score is 0 at baseline and >0 at post-baseline.
- Categorization by Number of New Morphometric Vertebral Fracture at Month 36, ITT [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Patients with 1 or more New Morphometric Vertebral Fracture as measured by SQ analysis of x-rays using the Genant scoring system (Ref: Genant 1993). SQ-Scores range from 0 (no fracture) to 3 (severe fracture). Incidence = SQ score is 0 at baseline and >0 at post-baseline.
- Incidence New Vertebral Fractures by SQ (Semi-Quantitative) Score, Patients Aged 4-9 Years, Month 12, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Month 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Patients aged 4-9 years with new morphometric vertebral fractures as measured by SQ analysis of x-rays using the Genant scoring system at Month 12 +/- 14 days. (Ref: Genant 1993). SQ Score mild - 0/no fracture to Grade 1, Moderate to Severe - change from 0/no fracture to Grade 2-3.
- Incidence New Vertebral Fractures by SQ Score, Patients Aged 10-15 Years, Month 12, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Month 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Patients aged 10-15 years with new morphometric vertebral fractures as measured by SQ analysis of x-rays using the Genant scoring system at Month 12 +/- 14 days. (Ref: Genant 1993). SQ Score mild - 0/no fracture to Grade 1, Moderate to Severe - change from 0/no fracture to Grade 2-3.
- Probability of Fracture in 12 Months (Kaplan-Meier Cumulative Incidence), ITT Population [ Time Frame: Time to First Event (days) up to 12 Months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Long bones include radius, ulna, humerus, tibia, fibula, femur, upper limb and lower limb fracture.
- Number of Clinical Fractures, Month 12, ITT Population [ Time Frame: 12 Months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Long bones include radius, ulna, humerus, tibia, fibula, femur, upper limb and lower limb fracture.
- Serum BAP - Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Baseline and 12 Months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Serum Bone Alkaline Phosphatase (BAP - bone formation marker). Negative percent changes indicate response to treatment.
- Serum BAP - Percent Change From Baseline to Month 24, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Baseline and 24 Months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Serum Bone Alkaline Phosphatase (BAP - bone formation marker). Negative percent changes indicate response to treatment.
- Serum BAP - Percent Change From Baseline to Month 36, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Baseline and 36 Months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Serum Bone Alkaline Phosphatase (BAP - bone formation marker). Negative percent changes indicate response to treatment.
- Urine NTX/Cr - Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Baseline and Endpoint / Month 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Urine type-I collagen N-telopeptide/creatinine (NTX/Cr; bone resorption marker). Negative percent changes indicate response to treatment.
- Urine NTX/Cr - Percent Change From Baseline at Month 24, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Urine type-I collagen N-telopeptide/creatinine (NTX/Cr; bone resorption marker). Negative percent changes indicate response to treatment.
- Urine NTX/Cr - Percent Change From Baseline at Month 36, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Urine type-I collagen N-telopeptide/creatinine (NTX/Cr; bone resorption marker). Negative percent changes indicate response to treatment.
- Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale - Change From Baseline to Month 12, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale (pain assessment scale using facial expressions, translated into a range from 0= no pain [smiling face] to 10= worst pain possible [distorted face with tears]; negative values indicate decrease in pain). Reference: Wong DL et al.
- Bone Age (Years), Change From Baseline to Month 12, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Bone Age determined by visual assessment of hand / wrist radiographs.
- Bone Age (Years), Change From Baseline to Month 24, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Bone Age determined by visual assessment of hand / wrist radiographs.
- Bone Age (Years), Change From Baseline to Month 36, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Bone Age determined by visual assessment of hand / wrist radiographs.
- Annualized Growth Velocity - Change From Baseline to Month 12, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Annualized Growth Velocity [= bone age change from baseline x (365.25/time in days between baseline and the bone age measurement)]
- Annualized Growth Velocity - Change From Baseline to Month 36, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Annualized Growth Velocity [= bone age change from baseline x (365.25/time in days between baseline and the bone age measurement)]
| Enrollment: | 143 |
| Study Start Date: | November 2004 |
| Study Completion Date: | March 2010 |
| Primary Completion Date: | April 2008 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Daily
placebo tablet, once a day for one year then for two years open label risedronate
|
Drug: Placebo
placebo tablet once a day for one year followed by risedronate once a day for two years
|
|
Experimental: Risedronate Daily
risedronate tablet, once a day for one year then for two years open label risedronate once a day
|
Drug: risedronate sodium (Actonel)
risedronate tablet once a day for one year followed by risedronate once a day for two years
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 4 Years to 15 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- OI diagnosis
- increased risk of fracture: either has a history of at least 1 radiographically confirmed, non-traumatic or low impact fracture plus low bone mineral density (BMD) or has very low BMD with or without a history of fractures.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any bisphosphonate use within one year of enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00106028
Show 20 Study Locations
Show 20 Study LocationsSponsors and Collaborators
Warner Chilcott
Investigators
| Study Director: | Dietrich H Wenderoth, MD | Procter and Gamble |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Warner Chilcott |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00106028 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 2003100, HMR4003I/3001 |
| Study First Received: | March 18, 2005 |
| Results First Received: | April 15, 2009 |
| Last Updated: | April 15, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Keywords provided by Warner Chilcott:
|
Primary disease: Osteogenesis Imperfecta |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Osteogenesis Imperfecta Osteochondrodysplasias Bone Diseases, Developmental Bone Diseases Musculoskeletal Diseases Genetic Diseases, Inborn Collagen Diseases Connective Tissue Diseases Risedronic acid |
Etidronic Acid Bone Density Conservation Agents Physiological Effects of Drugs Pharmacologic Actions Calcium Channel Blockers Membrane Transport Modulators Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Cardiovascular Agents Therapeutic Uses |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 19, 2013