Telbivudine Versus Lamivudine in Adults With Decompensated Chronic Hepatitis B and Evidence of Cirrhosis
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
This research study was conducted to compare the safety and effectiveness of the investigational medication, LdT (Telbivudine) versus Lamivudine, a drug currently approved by the US, European and Asian Health Authorities for the treatment of Hepatitis B infection. The results for patients taking LdT will be compared to results for patients taking lamivudine.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Hepatitis Hepatitis B, Chronic Cirrhosis |
Drug: Telbivudine Drug: Lamivudine Drug: Placebo |
Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Randomized, Double-Blind Trial of Telbivudine Versus Lamivudine in Adults With Decompensated Chronic Hepatitis B and Evidence of Cirrhosis |
- Number of Participants With Clinical Response [ Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 52 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Clinical response defined as achieving all of the following 3 criteria on at least 2 consecutive visits or at the last on-treatment visit: Serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA < 4 log10 copies/mL, normal Alanine transaminase (ALT) level (ALT ≤ Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)), and improvement (a 2- point or greater reduction in Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score) or stabilization (not more than a 1-point change in CTP score), compared to the baseline value. CTP scores range from 5-15, higher scores indicate more liver impairment. For Improvement/Stabilization, either of the individual criteria were met.
- Time to Initial Clinical Response [ Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 104 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Time to Clinical Response defined as the number of days elapsed from the baseline visit to achieving initial Clinical Response.
- Duration of Initial Clinical Response [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 104 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Kaplan-Meier method was used. The duration was calculated as: date of last visit before initial loss of clinical response - date of initial clinical response occurred+1. If a patient did not lose clinical response, it was then censored at the efficacy overall censoring date.
- Number of Participants With Improvement, Stabilization, and Worsening in Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) Score at Week 52 and Week 104 [ Time Frame: From Baseline to weeks 52 and 104 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) uses 2 clinical variables, ascites and encephalopathy, and 3 laboratory parameters, serum bilirubin, albumin, and prothrombin time. Each variable is assigned a score from 1 to 3, with the combined score comprising the CTP score range of 5 to 15 points. Higher scores indicate more impaired liver function. "Worsening" of CTP score was defined as a 2-point or greater increase from baseline, "improvement" in CTP score was defined as a 2-point or greater reduction from baseline, and "stabilization" of CTP score was defined as a change of 1-point or less from baseline.
- Number of Participants With Improvement, Stabilization, and Worsening in a Modified (3-component) CTP Score [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 104 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Modified CTP was calculated using the 3 biochemical-components (serum bilirubin, albumin, and prothrombin). Total scores range from 3-9; higher scores indicate more liver impairment. Improvement was defined as 2-point or greater reduction in score from baseline. Stabilization comprises a score change of 1-point or less from baseline. Worsening of CTP score was defined as a 2-point or greater increase from baseline. The rationale for assessing changes in this modified (3-component) CTP score is that this maneuver removed the two subjective components of CTP scoring (ascites and encephalopathy).
| Enrollment: | 232 |
| Study Start Date: | December 2003 |
| Primary Completion Date: | December 2009 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Telbivudine 600 mg
Participants received Telbivudine 600 mg and a matching lamivudine placebo orally once a day for up to 104 weeks. Participants were followed-up for 16 weeks post-treatment.
|
Drug: Telbivudine
600mg/day oral tablet for 104 weeks
Other Name: LDT600
Drug: Placebo
Telbivudine matching placebo or lamivudine matching placebo tablet.
|
|
Active Comparator: Lamivudine 100 mg
Lamivudine 100 mg and a Telbivudine matching placebo orally once a day for up to 104 weeks. Participants were followed-up for 16 weeks post-treatment.
|
Drug: Lamivudine
100mg/day oral tablet for 104 weeks
Drug: Placebo
Telbivudine matching placebo or lamivudine matching placebo tablet.
|
Detailed Description:
Multicenter, multinational, randomized, double-blind study designed to compare the safety and efficacy of telbivudine (600 mg/day) versus lamivudine (100 mg/day) for 104 weeks in adults with decompensated chronic hepatitis B and evidence of cirrhosis. Patients were pre-stratified by screening Child-Turcotte-Pugh score (CTP score < 9 or ≥ 9) and ALT level (within normal limits (WNL) or > 1.0 x ULN) to help assure similar degrees of hepatic insufficiency and liver inflammation on both treatment arms. After 104 weeks of treatment, participants were followed-up with for an additional 16 weeks.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 16 Years to 70 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Documented decompensated chronic hepatitis B defined by all of the following: 1. Clinical history compatible with decompensated chronic hepatitis B related cirrhosis; 2. Child-Turcotte-Pugh score > 7 points.
- Evidence of hepatic cirrhosis or portal hypertension.
Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient is pregnant or breastfeeding.
- Patient is coinfected with hepatitis C virus (HCV), hepatitis D virus (HDV), or Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
- Patient previously received lamivudine, adefovir, or an investigational anti-hepatitis B virus (HBV) nucleoside or nucleotide analog at any time
- Patient has received interferon or other immunomodulatory treatment for HBV infection in the 12 months before Screening for this study.
Other protocol-defined exclusion criteria may apply.
Contacts and Locations
Show 28 Study Locations
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | External Affairs, Novartis Pharmaceuticals |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00076336 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | CLDT600A2301 |
| Study First Received: | January 20, 2004 |
| Results First Received: | January 3, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | August 4, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Hepatitis Hepatitis A Hepatitis B Hepatitis, Chronic Liver Cirrhosis Fibrosis Hepatitis B, Chronic Liver Diseases Digestive System Diseases Hepatitis, Viral, Human Virus Diseases Enterovirus Infections Picornaviridae Infections RNA Virus Infections |
Hepadnaviridae Infections DNA Virus Infections Pathologic Processes Lamivudine Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors Nucleic Acid Synthesis Inhibitors Enzyme Inhibitors Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Pharmacologic Actions Anti-Retroviral Agents Antiviral Agents Anti-Infective Agents Therapeutic Uses Anti-HIV Agents |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 19, 2013