Low-Dose Decitabine Compared With Standard Supportive Care in Treating Older Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Recruitment status was Active, not recruiting
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
RATIONALE: Decitabine may help myelodysplasia cells develop into normal stem cells. It is not yet known if decitabine is more effective than standard supportive care in treating myelodysplastic syndrome.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of low-dose decitabine with that of standard supportive care in treating older patients who have myelodysplastic syndrome.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Leukemia Myelodysplastic Syndromes Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms |
Drug: decitabine |
Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Intravenous Low-Dose Decitabine Versus Supportive Care in Elderly Patients With Primary Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) (>10% Blasts or High-Risk Cytogenetics), Secondary MDS or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) Who Are Not Eligible for Intensive Therapy: An EORTC-German MDS Study Group Randomized Phase III Study |
- Duration of overall survival [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Best response rate as measured by Cheson response criteria [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Overall progression-free survival [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Toxicity as assessed by CTC v2.0 [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Quality of life as assessed by EORTC QLQ30 [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Days in Hospital [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Estimated Enrollment: | 220 |
| Study Start Date: | May 2002 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | May 2008 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
OBJECTIVES:
- Compare the efficacy of low-dose decitabine vs standard supportive care, in terms of overall survival, of elderly patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.
- Compare the response rate and progression-free survival of patients treated with these regimens.
- Determine the toxicity of decitabine in these patients.
- Assess the duration of hospitalization and number of blood transfusions in patients treated with these regimens.
- Assess the quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, open-label, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to cytogenetic risk factors (good vs poor vs intermediate vs unknown), disease (primary myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) vs secondary MDS), and participating center. Patients with a successful cytogenetic exam are also stratified according to overall International Prognostic Scoring System score (intermediate 1 vs intermediate 2 vs high risk). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive decitabine IV over 4 hours every 8 hours for 3 days. Treatment repeats every 6 weeks for 4-8 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Arm II: Patients receive standard supportive care. Quality of life is assessed at baseline, every 6 weeks during therapy, every 2 months for 1 year, and then every 3 months thereafter.
Patients are followed every 2 months for 1 year and then every 3 months thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 220 patients (110 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study within 2 years.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 60 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
Diagnosis of primary or secondary myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS)
- Any FAB or WHO criteria cellular type allowed
Bone marrow blast count on aspiration or biopsy of 1 of the following:
- No more than 10% with poor cytogenetic risk factors (defined as any numerical or structural abnormality of chromosome 7 and/or complex abnormalities)
- 11-20%
- 21-30% for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) secondary to MDS (i.e., refractory anemia with excess blasts in transformation by FAB classification)
- Patients who failed the cytogenetic exam are allowed provided bone marrow blasts are at least 5% and/or 2-3 cytopenias are present
- No rapid progression towards full-blown AML
- No blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukemia
- No t(8;21) alone or in combination with other abnormalities
- Ineligible for intensive chemotherapy (e.g., cytarabine or an anthracycline)
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Age
- 60 and over
Performance status
- WHO 0-2
Life expectancy
- Not specified
Hematopoietic
- See Disease Characteristics
Hepatic
- Bilirubin less than 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
- Hepatitis B surface antigen negative
Renal
- Creatinine less than 1.5 times ULN
Cardiovascular
- No severe cardiovascular disease
- No arrhythmias requiring chronic treatment
- No congestive heart failure
- No New York Heart Association class III or IV heart disease
- No symptomatic ischemic heart disease
Other
- HIV negative
- No active uncontrolled infection
- No other malignancy within the past 3 years except basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix within the past 2 years
- No prior or concurrent evidence of CNS or psychiatric disorders requiring hospitalization
- No psychological, familial, sociological, or geographical condition that would preclude study
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Biologic therapy
- More than 6 weeks since prior growth factors for primary MDS
- No concurrent antiangiogenic drugs (e.g., thalidomide)
- No concurrent interleukin, interferon, or anti-thymocyte globulin
Chemotherapy
- See Disease Characteristics
- More than 6 weeks since prior hydroxyurea for primary MDS
- No other prior chemotherapy for MDS or AML
- Prior chemotherapy for solid tumors or lymphoma (resulting in secondary MDS) allowed
Endocrine therapy
- No concurrent steroids (except as inhalation therapy)
Radiotherapy
- Prior radiotherapy for solid tumors or lymphoma (resulting in secondary MDS) allowed
Surgery
- Not specified
Other
- More than 6 weeks since prior immunosuppressive agents for primary MDS
- No concurrent amifostine
- No concurrent cyclosporine
- No other concurrent experimental therapies
Contacts and Locations
Show 46 Study Locations| Investigator: | Pierre W. Wijermans, MD, PhD | HagaZiekenhuis - Locatie Leyenburg |
| Investigator: | Michael Luebbert, MD | University Hospital Freiburg |
More Information
Additional Information:
Publications:
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00043134 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | CDR0000256224, EORTC-06011, SUPERGEN-EORTC-06011, GMDSG-EORTC-06011, EudraCT-2005-002830 |
| Study First Received: | August 5, 2002 |
| Last Updated: | April 10, 2010 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Federal Government |
Keywords provided by National Cancer Institute (NCI):
|
chronic myelomonocytic leukemia de novo myelodysplastic syndromes previously treated myelodysplastic syndromes refractory anemia refractory anemia with excess blasts refractory anemia with excess blasts in transformation |
refractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia secondary myelodysplastic syndromes atypical chronic myeloid leukemia, BCR-ABL negative myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm, unclassifiable |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Neoplasms Leukemia Leukemia, Myelomonocytic, Chronic Myelodysplastic Syndromes Preleukemia Myeloproliferative Disorders Myelodysplastic-Myeloproliferative Diseases Neoplasms by Histologic Type Leukemia, Myeloid Bone Marrow Diseases |
Hematologic Diseases Precancerous Conditions Decitabine Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic Antimetabolites Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Pharmacologic Actions Antineoplastic Agents Therapeutic Uses Enzyme Inhibitors |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 17, 2013