Comparison of Three Chemotherapy Regimens in Treating Patients With Stage IVB, Recurrent, or Persistent Cervical Cancer
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known which chemotherapy regimen is more effective for cervical cancer.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of three different chemotherapy regimens in treating patients with stage IVB, recurrent, or persistent cervical cancer.
|Study Design:||Allocation: Randomized
Primary Purpose: Treatment
|Official Title:||A Randomized Phase III Study of Cisplatin Versus Cisplatin Plus Topotecan Versus MVAC in Stage IVB, Recurrent or Persistent Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix|
|Study Start Date:||June 1999|
|Primary Completion Date:||January 2007 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
- Compare the response rate and survival of patients with stage IVB, recurrent, or persistent carcinoma of the cervix treated with cisplatin only vs cisplatin plus topotecan vs methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC). (Arm III (MVAC) closed to accrual effective 07/23/2001.)
- Compare the toxic effects of these regimens in this patient population.
- Compare health-related quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to GOG performance status. Patients are randomized to one of three treatment arms. (Arm III closed to accrual effective 07/23/2001.)
- Arm I: Patients receive cisplatin IV once every 21 days.
- Arm II:Patients receive topotecan IV over 30 minutes on days 1-3 and cisplatin IV (beginning after topotecan infusion) on day 1. Courses repeat every 21 days.
- Arm III:Patients receive methotrexate IV on days 1, 15, and 22, vinblastine IV on days 2, 15, and 22, and doxorubicin IV and cisplatin IV on day 2. Courses repeat every 28 days. (Arm III closed to accrual effective 07/23/2001.) Treatment in all arms continues for a maximum of 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. (Arm III closed to accrual effective 07/23/2001.)
Quality of life is assessed before randomization, before course 2, before course 5 (arms I and II), before course 4 (arm III), and at 9 months. (Arm III closed to accrual effective 07/23/2001.)
Patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 400 patients (133 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study within 2 years. (Arm III closed to accrual effective 07/23/2001.)
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00003945
|United States, Indiana|
|Indiana University Cancer Center|
|Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202-5289|
|United States, Iowa|
|Mercy Cancer Center at Mercy Medical Center-Des Moines|
|Des Moines, Iowa, United States, 50314|
|Iowa Lutheran Hospital|
|Des Moines, Iowa, United States, 50316-2301|
|John Stoddard Cancer Center at Iowa Methodist Medical Center|
|Des Moines, Iowa, United States, 50309|
|United States, Nebraska|
|Midlands Cancer Center at Midlands Community Hospital|
|Papillion, Nebraska, United States, 68128-4157|
|United States, New Mexico|
|MBCCOP - University of New Mexico HSC|
|Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States, 87131|
|United States, Pennsylvania|
|Penn State Cancer Institute at Milton S. Hershey Medical Center|
|Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States, 17033-0850|
|United States, Wisconsin|
|CCOP - St. Vincent Hospital Cancer Center, Green Bay|
|Green Bay, Wisconsin, United States, 54307-3453|
|Australia, New South Wales|
|Westmead, New South Wales, Australia, 2145|
|Instituto de Enfermedades Neoplasicas|
|Lima, Peru, 34|
|San Juan City Hospital|
|San Juan, Puerto Rico, 00936-7344|
|Study Chair:||Harry J. Long, MD||Mayo Clinic|
|Study Chair:||Higinia R. Cardenes, MD, PhD||Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center|